Hoi,
Congratulations on the new version of DBpedia :) .. This makes it an
auspicious occasion to talk about future collaboration.
At this time several Wikimedians are busy harvesting data from Wikipedia
and loading it into Wikidata. You are harvesting data from Wikipedia and
loading it into
Hi Gerard and all,
Von: Gerard Meijssen [mailto:gerard.meijs...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. September 2013 10:26
An: Kingsley Idehen
Cc: Discussion list for the Wikidata project.; Chris Bizer; Samuel Klein; Sören
Auer; Christian Bizer
Betreff: Re: [Wikidata-l] Cooperation between
Speaking from DBpedia (not on behalf), we have been always trying to find
ways to contribute data back to wikipedia and If licencing is the only
issue here I am sure we can make any necessary arrangements.
imho the main scepticism so far was trust from the WIkipedia community to
load data in
Hoi,
Two things to consider; the Wikipedia community and the Wikidata community
are two separate entities. As far as I am concerned, Wikidata needs more
data to get to the tipping point where it becomes useful to users. I am
really vocal about both.
The license has traditionally been a sticking
On 8/26/13 4:34 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Two things to consider; the Wikipedia community and the Wikidata
community are two separate entities. As far as I am concerned,
Wikidata needs more data to get to the tipping point where it becomes
useful to users. I am really vocal about both.
Hoi,
As you may have noticed there are other people on the CC..
The not invented here refers to much of the Wiki world.. things get done
but much is done over and over again EVEN when cooperation is easy and
obvious. I have largely resigned myself to it, it is probably part of our
persona.
Hoi,
I have been blogging a lot the last two days with DBpedia in mind. My
understanding is that at DBpedia a lot of effort went into making something
of a cohesive model of properties. Now that the main type GND is about to
be deleted, it makes sense to adopt much of the work that has been done
Il giorno 23/ago/2013 11:54, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
[...] Now that the main type GND is about to be deleted, it makes sense
to adopt much of the work that has been done at DBpedia. [...]
May you explain better what we may want to adopt and which properties are
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.comwrote:
I have been blogging a lot the last two days with DBpedia in mind. My
understanding is that at DBpedia a lot of effort went into making something
of a cohesive model of properties. Now that the main type GND is
Hoi,
The questions are:
- would we advance a lot when we adopt the DBpedia schema as it is?
- Would we be open to include substantially more data?
- When we adopt the schema, can we tinker with it to suit our needs?
If the answers to these questions are yes, what is the point in
10 matches
Mail list logo
