On 04/04/12 06:33, aniketkarmar...@aniketkarmarkar.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I must agree that these emails are getting a bit overwhelming. I am not
even finding time to read more than 1 or 2 of them.
I think a forum would be very helpful to keep at the ideas organized.
Aniket
Why would a
On 04/04/12 21:08, Oren Bochman wrote:
I would imagine developing such an acdemiwiki could be to developed
quite quickly once MW matures. I would need cloud based storage, a
source control system, advanced means of authentications. P2P
capabilities. But almost all of these things now are
On 04/04/12 19:13, emijrp wrote:
I'm not sure if that kind of data will be desirable at Wikidata (not my
personal opinion, just thinking about community).
For example, a lot of city articles contain info about temperature and
precipitation[1], but, are we going to import into Wikidata all
On 14/04/12 11:29, Jan Kučera wrote:
How are we going to manage bugs? Will a new component under Wikimedia
at bugzilla be added?
It already exists:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions
Wikidata
WikidataClient
WikidataRepo
You want more components? :D
On 29/11/12 15:37, Avenue wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but why should we restrict Wikidata to a
single standard license (or dual-license)? Why not be like Commons,
where content can be uploaded under various free licenses?
This would have the advantage of letting us respect the
On 08/01/13 22:31, LD 100 wrote:
I would preferred if this could also be changed by each users
individually in the settings (maybe the settings could be set
globally)
Although preferences are evil, I see the point for customizing this.
Having ar: in the top if I have no idea of that language
