http://www.flickr.com/photos/chiropractic/3601011581/
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
2009/6/7 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chiropractic/3601011581/
- d.
Unfortunate but unsurprising. Not that long ago Google was telling
traditional media that they should construct their articles in a more
wikipedia like manner (ie continuously update a single
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:43 AM, genigeni...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/7 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chiropractic/3601011581/
- d.
Unfortunate but unsurprising.
Fortunate and surprising, actually. Wikipedia articles actually serve
the purpose of an news source
Please see WT:NOT, WT:FICT, and the AFD logs. You'll have a lot of reading
to do to catch up on this, but there is one helpful factor: it is endlessly
repetitive.
Heh, thank you.
AGK
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chiropractic/3601011581/
- d.
Wikipedia only aggregates news, but as those who read many newspapers,
and watch several channels of TV know, that is what all news sources do;
they develop a few stories independently, but the bulk of their coverage
is aggregated.
2009/6/6 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
no synopsis can substitute for what the text of the
licensehttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GNU_Free_Documentation_Licensesays,
and if in doubt the reuser should seek a proper legal opinion (
Unfortunate but unsurprising. Not that long ago Google was
telling traditional media that they should construct their articles in a
more wikipedia like manner (ie continuously update a single article
per event rather than creating a string of new articles).
Unsurprising indeed. I get the
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/6/7 Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net:
Unfortunate but unsurprising. Not that long ago Google was telling
traditional media that they should construct their articles in a more
wikipedia like manner (ie continuously update a single article per
event rather than
In a message dated 6/7/2009 7:15:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki...@googlemail.com writes:
Unsurprising indeed. I get the impression, from projects such as Knol,
that
Google is something of an admirer of the Wikipedia model.
-
Knol however is only collaborative on the
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:15 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 6/7/2009 7:15:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki...@googlemail.com writes:
Unsurprising indeed. I get the impression, from projects such as Knol,
that
Google is something of an admirer of the Wikipedia model.
2009/6/7 AGK wiki...@googlemail.com:
Unfortunate but unsurprising. Not that long ago Google was
telling traditional media that they should construct their articles in a
more wikipedia like manner (ie continuously update a single article
per event rather than creating a string of new
2009/6/7 geni geni...@gmail.com:
Perhaps more directly the recent actions of Google and Microsoft bing
suggest that part of being a modern search engine is effectively
presenting wikipedia content to people.
It was certainly surprising to see Microsoft getting into directly
providing a
2009/6/7 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/6/7 geni geni...@gmail.com:
Perhaps more directly the recent actions of Google and Microsoft bing
suggest that part of being a modern search engine is effectively
presenting wikipedia content to people.
It was certainly surprising to see
13 matches
Mail list logo
