I like this. Ideally IAR should never be invoked, as its not a rule; IAR
should be assumed. That said, I agree with the call and want to give props
for the detailed explanation, which should help smooth things over.
- causa sui
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:40 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
2009/10/20 Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com:
I like this. Ideally IAR should never be invoked, as its not a rule; IAR
should be assumed. That said, I agree with the call and want to give props
for the detailed explanation, which should help smooth things over.
I disagree. Following rules
Ryan Delaney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com
mailto:charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Apoc 2400 wrote:
Isn't it time to be honest with ourselves and nominate
Wikipedia is not a
bureaucracy for deletion?
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/10/20 Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com:
I like this. Ideally IAR should never be invoked, as its not a rule; IAR
should be assumed. That said, I agree with the call and want to give props
for the detailed explanation, which should help smooth things over.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/10/20 Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com:
I like this. Ideally IAR should never be invoked, as its not a rule;
IAR
should be assumed. That said, I agree with the call and want to give
props
for the
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Ryan Delaney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com
mailto:charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Apoc 2400 wrote:
Isn't it time to
2009/10/20 Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com:
This is a bizarre, but ancient, misunderstanding of IAR. All IAR means is
that priority number one is doing what is right, rather than pedantic
allegiance to a dictatorial interpretation of rules. Since IAR is not itself
a justification for
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/10/20 Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com:
This is a bizarre, but ancient, misunderstanding of IAR. All IAR means is
that priority number one is doing what is right, rather than pedantic
allegiance to a
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a bizarre, but ancient, misunderstanding of IAR. All IAR means is
that priority number one is doing what is right, rather than pedantic
allegiance to a dictatorial interpretation of rules. Since IAR is not
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is a bizarre, but ancient, misunderstanding of IAR. All IAR means is
that priority number one is doing what is right, rather than
10 matches
Mail list logo
