Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that's a noble goal, and the idea behind this project seems like a
good one. Incidentally, I'm probably in the running for most rabid
inclusionist here.
Correcting systematic wrongs is, I agree, good.
I think we all ought to be able to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/07/2009, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ian Woollardian.wooll...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's looking to me like 3.5 million is about the plateau, since the
curve is
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
stevertigo wrote:
Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
nagios?
ganglia?
4-CPU apache?
scap?
swap?
memcached node?
eyes glazing over
Is it fixed now? Oh, good. :-)
Off the top of my head...
Nagios is
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/07/2009, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ian Woollardian.wooll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Carcharoth
carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
As long as history doesn't come to an end, and new people keep getting
born and (annoyingly) becoming notable enough for a Wikipedia article,
there will always be a need for new articles.
Not to mention people's
Bod Notbod wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Carcharoth
carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
As long as history doesn't come to an end, and new people keep getting
born and (annoyingly) becoming notable enough for a Wikipedia article,
there will always be a need for new articles.
2009/11/17 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Bod Notbod wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Carcharoth
carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
As long as history doesn't come to an end, and new people keep getting
born and (annoyingly) becoming notable enough for a Wikipedia
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:08 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
http://www.floatingsheep.org/2009/11/mapping-wikipedia.html
That is fascinating. Thanks for posting that link.
Gives us some idea where the gaps are but not to the extent you might
think (there are simply fewer citable
On 17/11/2009, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
As long as history doesn't come to an end, and new people keep getting
born and (annoyingly) becoming notable enough for a Wikipedia article,
there will always be a need for new articles.
Maybe, but I don't know how many. That level
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
And to be honest, if I had Googled myself some understanding of this,
I may have ended up even more confused about it. If I had asked
questions like this on the wikitech-l mailing list, would I have been
told to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
As you can see, this doesn't really contain any info useful to anyone
but server admins. Which is why it was originally posted to
wikitech-l, not wikien-l.
True, but thanks for explaining anyway. Much
Carcharoth wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
As you can see, this doesn't really contain any info useful to anyone
but server admins. Which is why it was originally posted to
wikitech-l, not wikien-l.
True, but
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
snip
The most important thing is to decide what we are going to cross-post to
wikitech-l to induce equal bafflement. Something involving 57 different
flavours of idiosyncratic interpretation of IAR, and
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
The most important thing is to decide what we are going to cross-post to
wikitech-l to induce equal bafflement. Something involving 57 different
flavours of idiosyncratic interpretation of IAR, and who
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106554
Linked and digged from a current article. Quite chuckleworthy.
-S
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, stevertigo stv...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106554
Linked and digged from a current article. Quite chuckleworthy.
-S
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
2009/11/17 Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com:
As you can see, this doesn't really contain any info useful to anyone
but server admins. Which is why it was originally posted to
wikitech-l, not wikien-l.
If of some interest though. http://ganglia.wikimedia.org/ is also of
general
Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Actually neither of them are caching managers or have any direct
role in caching.
OK. Various monitoring tools is sort of sufficient.
Stevertigo wrote:
Caching basically just
means keeping wiki pages in RAM so that things get fetched quickly -
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
The original message was not cross-posted. Andrew posted it on wikitech-l
only.
Well if a 17 minute site crash is no big deal as Tim said.. Then a
little casual informative crossposting ain't worth frettin over, eh?
-Stevertigo
You're
http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/ask-an-astrobiologist/intro/nibiru-and-doomsday-2012-questions-and-answers
I was struck by the repeated suggestions to look this stuff up on Wikipedia.
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To
I'm not here to discuss the wording of the fundraising slogans yet
again, but this one screams legal trouble:
Wikipedia. Ad-free forever.
[Progress bar] [Donate now button]
I'd interpret this as if we reach $7.5M, Wikipedia will be ad-free
forever. I really wish that'd be the case, but if not,
http://www.examiner.com/x-9052-Orlando-Roman-Catholic-Examiner~y2009m11d13-The-Vatican-in-cyber-social-networking
The Vatican's official Facebook application -Pope2You- which allows
users to receive the latest messages and photos of Pope Benedict VXI,
as well as to send virtual postcards to
2009/11/17 Nathan nawr...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, stevertigo stv...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106554
Linked and digged from a current article. Quite chuckleworthy.
Now that it is what it is, any idiot can look back and say it was
obvious what would
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Carcharoth
carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
The closest I've come to writing about things in other countries is here:
Aww, I'm a *much* better person than you:
New Zealand: Broken River, New Zealand, Craigieburn Valley, Fox Peak,
Invincible Snowfields, Mount
Indeed. Looking at this:
http://www.floatingsheep.org/2009/11/mapping-wikipedia.html
This is a similar mapping:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Imageworld-artphp3.png
I think there is a huge number of notable topics that we have not yet
covered. Sure, there may be fewer sources about
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Apoc 2400 apoc2...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. Looking at this:
http://www.floatingsheep.org/2009/11/mapping-wikipedia.html
This is a similar mapping:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Imageworld-artphp3.png
I think there is a huge number of notable
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:07 AM, stevertigo stv...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106554
Linked and digged from a current article. Quite chuckleworthy.
So cool!
The truth in no online database will replace your daily newspaper,
reddit.com pretty much did for me.
no CD-ROM can
On 17/11/2009, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
And at least Clifford Stoll actually knew what the heck he was talking
about, unlike most media pontificators at the time.
I can't remember whether I read this when it came out- if I did, and I
think I did, I quickly dismissed it; it was
Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that it is what it is, any idiot can look back and say it was
obvious what would happen. Far more people got it wrong 15-20 years
ago, and I guess its good for a chuckle (especially since this
particular writer was so condescending) - but hindsight is as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all!
Next Thursday's office hours will feature Véronique Kessler, the
Foundation's Chief Financial Officer. If you don't know
Naoko, you can get to know her at
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/V%C3%A9ronique_Kessler.
Office hours on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cary Bass wrote:
Hello all!
Next Thursday's office hours will feature Véronique Kessler, the
Foundation's Chief Financial Officer. If you don't know Naoko, you
can get to know her at
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/V%C3%A9ronique_Kessler.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Apoc 2400 apoc2...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there is a huge number of notable topics that we have not yet
covered. Sure, there may be fewer sources about central Africa, but
what about China and South America? The areas most Wikipedians care
about are well
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm not here to discuss the wording of the fundraising slogans yet
again, but this one screams legal trouble:
Wikipedia. Ad-free forever.
[Progress bar] [Donate now button]
I'd interpret this as if we reach
33 matches
Mail list logo
