On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 January 2010 23:00, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
Repeat after me: Pure Wiki Deletion.
Last time the subject came up, I believe the advocates were asked for
any examples, anywhere, of wikis that use
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor seems to be going from article to article,
deleting every prose paragraph that doesn't have a ref tag (usually
everything except the intro sentence).
Ryan Delaney wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 January 2010 23:00, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
Repeat after me: Pure Wiki Deletion.
Last time the subject came up, I believe the advocates were asked for
any
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Adam Koenigsberg wrote:
I oppose this mass deletion but support the theory behind it, that is to
say, I would support this deletion criteria but believe this to be out of
process. Being Bold doesn't extend to administrator tools, IMHO. This
reminds me of the Userbox mass
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor seems to be going from article to article,
deleting every prose paragraph that doesn't have a ref tag (usually
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Apoc 2400 wrote:
It is commonly said that anyone can remove unsourced information, and that
the burden lies on the editor who wants to include information to provide a
source. I have always taken this to mean that if I think something is wrong
or otherwise does not belong
Can anybody explain what PWD is?
Thanks,
Emily
On Jan 26, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Ryan Delaney wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 January 2010 23:00, Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com
wrote:
Repeat after me: Pure Wiki Deletion.
Last time
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Emily Monroe bluecalioc...@me.com wrote:
Can anybody explain what PWD is?
Pure Wiki Deletion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pure_wiki_deletion_system
Carcharoth
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
Emily Monroe wrote:
Can anybody explain what PWD is?
Surely. But in another thread, I hope.
Charles
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
Gwern Branwen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor seems to be going from article to article,
deleting every prose paragraph that
Hello all!
Tomorrow's office hours will feature Rebecca Handler, the Foundation's
Head of Major Gifts. If you don't know Rebecca
you can read all about her at
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Rebecca_Handler.
Office hours tomorrow are from 2330 to 0030 UTC (3:30 PM - 4:30 PM PST).
If
On 01/26/2010 01:18 PM, Ken Arromdee wrote:
The problem is that even if you're only supposed to remove contentious
unsourced material, there's absolutely nothing anyone can do to you if you
remove noncontentious material.
I think it's reasonable to ask the remover if they're actually
I've been checking our FAs, and they too contain unsourced material.
It is presumably sourced in the general references somewhere. The best
way of making such article totally unreadable would be to put inline
sources for every sentence. The only place I have ever seen it done is
some of the more
I appreciate being listed as an honorable exception, but I'm not an
except. I see a lot of other people doing just the same as as I--about
3/4 of the articles I see on prod and put aside to be worked on later
in the day, are in fact sourced by the timer I get there. sometimes,
rather
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Gwern Branwen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Adam Koenigsberg wrote:
I oppose this mass deletion but support the theory behind it, that is to
say, I would support this deletion criteria but believe this to be out of
process. Being Bold doesn't
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:45 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Agreed with David G. on this point. The general sentiment to keep up
with BLPs is ok, I think; but most of the time sources can be found
for most bios. (And yes, I do make an occasional hobby of sourcing
random
Sheesh. I was on a press conference call today with one of the deleted
people as a speaker.
*Robert Corell* is the Director of the Global Change Program at The H. John
Heinz III Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment and is a Senior
Policy Fellow at the Policy Program of the American
Where was Robert Corell's article previously? Perhaps my search was
inadequate but I didn't find it looking quickly...
-george
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:07 PM, The Cunctator cuncta...@gmail.com wrote:
Sheesh. I was on a press conference call today with one of the deleted
people as a speaker.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:46 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
Where was Robert Corell's article previously? Perhaps my search was
inadequate but I didn't find it looking quickly...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Corell
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
