Tom - Great idea.
I believe what we want to end up with is OSQA, like what OSM has set
up, not a (proprietary) StackOverflow site.
OSQA is a great tool for collaborative knowledge-sharing.
http://meta.osqa.net/questions/127/osqa-vs-stackoverflow-performance-and-features
SJ
On Thu, Jan 27,
http://www.i-freelancer.org/php/wikipedia-expert-wanted-to-delete-article/
(spotted by Tinu Cherian)
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
On 06/02/2011 13:53, Samuel Klein wrote:
Tom - Great idea.
I believe what we want to end up with is OSQA, like what OSM has set
up, not a (proprietary) StackOverflow site.
OSQA is a great tool for collaborative knowledge-sharing.
I'm quite willing to contact them, afd each article on their list, and if
consensus is that any merit deletion, I will donate the proceeds to the
WMF.
Scott
I've tried bidding on that basis myself; it is futile. They want someone
who breaks, or at least manipulates the rule, not someone that
It would be instructive to know what articles they are worried about and
why. I find that most people wanting articles deleted have a good reason
and, while deletion may not be justified by Wikipedia's rules, there are
often problems with the articles that we ought to address.
People wanting
It would be instructive to know what articles they are worried about and
why. I find that most people wanting articles deleted have a good reason
and, while deletion may not be justified by Wikipedia's rules, there
are
often problems with the articles that we ought to address.
People
On 6 February 2011 19:07, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
I'm not sure exactly how someone is expected to communicate with us.
Although I suppose OTRS is how, but how does someone who is not familiar
with our system find it?
The Contact Wikipedia or Help links?
Quite a lot of
