On 12 September 2011 00:18, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ah, I thought it might have been a reference to Greg, but I did
harbour a slight hope that the shade of James Clerk Maxwell might have
been involved as well. Do you have a link to any news articles where
JSTOR and
On 11/09/2011 22:08, David Gerard wrote:
On 11 September 2011 22:07, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
Greg put the lot up on BitTorrent and wrote an eloquent message which
more or less says Come on if you think you're hard enough.
(To be precisely, the pre-1923 stuff that is
On 12 September 2011 10:50, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Given the dominant place JSTOR occupies in the sphere of reliable
sources, we are singularly fortunate (on a strategic view) that their
response has been eirenic.
I would have been surprised if they had
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist
That's an interesting article (not read the other ones yet). I
actually got a job offer from an academic publisher around 11 years
ago
I have taken the survey; I agree with Evangeline that some of my answers to
the questions will be of little use because they did not apply.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Evangeline Han bejin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bo Xu,
I took the survey. Just wanted to point out that some of the questions
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 08:40, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist
That's an interesting article (not read the other ones
