http://savageminds.org/2012/01/19/wikipedia-encyclopedias/
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
http://savageminds.org/2012/01/19/wikipedia-encyclopedias/
Probably not the first and not the last. I don't find it that surprising.
What he says there is excellent, though. Well worth reading.
Carcharoth
http://savageminds.org/2012/01/19/wikipedia-encyclopedias/
- d.
Note that citing references is forbidden; proof Wikipedia is not a real
encyclopedia.
Fred
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing
-Original Message-
To: English Wikipedia
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] A Wikipedian asked to write for a paper
encyclopedia
http://savageminds.org/2012/01/19/wikipedia-encyclopedias/
- d.
Note that citing references is forbidden; proof Wikipedia is not a real
encyclopedia.
On 20 January 2012 13:18, wiki doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com wrote:
snip
Yes, but.
Ultimately, a paper encyclopedia says This article is written by a
qualified person (you can see his name) he has been chosen by an expert
panel (here are their names) and his work will be reviewed by them. All
2012/1/20 Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net:
http://savageminds.org/2012/01/19/wikipedia-encyclopedias/
- d.
Note that citing references is forbidden; proof Wikipedia is not a real
encyclopedia.
Thank you very much for this link, David.
I submitted an article for a four-volume paper
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
The biggest difference was in the editorial process - deciding on the
scope of the article, finding reviewers, proofreading, communicating
with other writers etc. Since it's not over yet, i cannot write more
2012/1/20 Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
The biggest difference was in the editorial process - deciding on the
scope of the article, finding reviewers, proofreading, communicating
with other writers
On 20 January 2012 14:10, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
This is the interesting (if now quite old) debate about traditional
encyclopedias. Yes, Britannica or any other old-style commercial
encyclopedia is keen to tell you about expert authors. Less keen, for
example,
