I kinda like the separation between cross-project and cross-language issues
on Wikimedia-L and the discussion about English Wikipedia, but if nobody is
interested in the existence of this list, I won't be very sad if it shut
down.
I'd shut down Wikipedia-L first, however - that one is really
2013/5/11 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
This is all the Visual Editor edits in en:wp:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChangestagfilter=visualeditor
It's not many. So please switch it on (you can still click Edit
source to do references and templates) and give it a
And what's even worse, the very different templates used in each
language version.
2012/6/20 Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com
PS. Forgot to say that this claim misses several points about how
different language Wikipedias often have very different articles on
the same topic (i.e. they
2012/3/22 Alan Liefting alieft...@ihug.co.nz:
Does anyone agree with me that the inclusionists are more numerous than the
deletionists around the deletion discussions?
If you tell us how you counted, we can try to agree or to disagree.
It's pointless to talk about subjective feelings.
--
Amir
2012/1/20 Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net:
http://savageminds.org/2012/01/19/wikipedia-encyclopedias/
- d.
Note that citing references is forbidden; proof Wikipedia is not a real
encyclopedia.
Thank you very much for this link, David.
I submitted an article for a four-volume paper
2012/1/20 Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
The biggest difference was in the editorial process - deciding on the
scope of the article, finding reviewers, proofreading, communicating
with other writers
2010/12/23 WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com:
I don't use talkback templates myself, and find them somewhat
irritating, but I can live with them if that keeps liquid threads at
bay.
Talkback templates are incomparably more bogus than LiquidThreads.
Something like LiquidThreads is
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:33, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=8e519637-afb0-4134-a91f-7b0ebea8d933
Spotted by Shizhao.
Anyone used this and able to report if the wikitext output is any good?
I saw this email, i tried to write
2010/8/20 Gwern Branwen gwe...@gmail.com:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/18/wikipedia-editing-zionist-groups
Yesha Council, representing the Jewish settler movement, and the rightwing
Israel Sheli (My I srael) movement, ran their first workshop this week in
Jerusalem, teaching
2010/7/27 Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Philippe Beaudette
pbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'd like to begin a conversation about the 2010-2011 Fundraiser, which
isn't slated to launch for a few months, but for which we'd like to
get community involvement
2010/7/27 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
On 27 July 2010 11:56, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
A friend of mine woke up in the middle of the night with a belly-ache.
He googled it (in Hebrew) and the first result was the Hebrew
Wikipedia article about appendicitis
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:20, Naoko Komura nkom...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Just a quick update:
Updated search interface was rolled-out to English Wikipedia earlier
today. Thank you all for your quick feedback.
Thanks for fixing the full-text search.
There's a significant change from Monobook
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:15, Naoko Komura nkom...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We have updated the new search interface to address the issues above and
it is currently staged on the the prototype [1]. This update addresses
the reported issues such as truncation of search queries [2] and the
search
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 17:40, Steve Summit s...@eskimo.com wrote:
Carcharoth wrote:
I suppose the idea is that most people using that search box want
go functionality,
Many tech-savvy editors, perhaps, but certainly not most readers.
not search functionality, but seeing as Google's
14 matches
Mail list logo