Re: [WikiEN-l] Date conditional switching templates

2009-05-12 Thread Mark Nilrad
The thing about the template is that after the date it's useless; it can just be plain text. So, someone will come and remove it, which is just the same as having to update the date manually. ___ WikiEN-l mailing list

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikialarm

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Nilrad
Why is this needed when there are already RSS/Atom feeds for every article history? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peloponnesian_Warfeed=rssaction=history That's one, for example. Did they just happen to overlook that? From: Carcharoth

[WikiEN-l] And Wikipedia's best area of coverage is...

2009-04-24 Thread Mark Nilrad
Tropical cyclones. Anyone surprised? That's followed by Illinois, and the Simpsons. I made a full list at User:Noble Story/Project stats. Actually, I was surprised at how good the Vital articles coverage was. 16% of the articles are approved, which is eleventh best. Not bad, as opposed to what

Re: [WikiEN-l] An open letter to Jimmy Wales

2009-04-10 Thread Mark Nilrad
Wikipedia says Wikipedia was a complementary project for Nupedia. Citenzendium says Wikipedia was an accidental spin-off of Nupedia. Is there any reason to say that? How can a project be an accidental spin-off of something else? Noble Story From: Carcharoth

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Slashdot] The Role of Experts In Wikipedia

2009-02-20 Thread Mark Nilrad
the articles that Wikipedia has without getting more and more editors. Another reason why being nice to newcomers and leaving a good first impression is so crucial. Obviously, as you can read in the Slashdot comments (and many other places), this is not Wikipedia's strength, at all. Mark Nilrad