Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-03 Thread Ken Arromdee
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Casey Brown wrote: In the end, it should matter what is written and how it's supported -- not who wrote it. This idea sounds great. Is there a policy or rule for it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UCS? :-) Doesn't work. Any rule which says to use common sense will

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-03 Thread Dan Dascalescu
I see appeals to common sense as a way to jolt people out of rules-lawyering. If only more admins had any common sense... I mean no [[WP:ATTACK]] of course: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Foswikidiff=prevoldid=268623922 Dan

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-03 Thread geni
2009/4/3 Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com: Not quite. If someone disagrees with you, you can explain why they are wrong, and at the end of the argument, you can appeal to common sense. Sometimes, if that person steps back and considers things with that mention of common sense in mind,

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-02 Thread Casey Brown
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Dan Dascalescu ddascalescu+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote: In the end, it should matter what is written and how it's supported -- not who wrote it. This idea sounds great. Is there a policy or rule for it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UCS? :-) -- Casey Brown

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread George Herbert
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Elias Friedman elipo...@gmail.com wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Earth_(2nd_nomination)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Earth_%282nd_nomination%29 I can't find a single reference on it which

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread geni
2009/4/1 Elias Friedman elipo...@gmail.com: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Earth_(2nd_nomination) And before anyone gets too outraged, do make note of today's date. One of these days people will learn to be original. -- geni

[WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Elias Friedman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Earth_(2nd_nomination) And before anyone gets too outraged, do make note of today's date. Elias Friedman A.S., EMT-P ⚕ אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי elipo...@gmail.com http://elipongo.blogspot.com/ ___

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Ken Arromdee
Generally, I'm not a fan of this sort of joke. They give the impression of we get to break the rules when we want to, as long as it's funny. Meanwhile, everyone else has to follow them. (And WP:COI really does seem to say it's a conflict of interest for an article about the Earth to be made by

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread James Farrar
2009/4/1 Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvards...@gmail.com: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote: Generally, I'm not a fan of this sort of joke.  They give the impression of we get to break the rules when we want to, as long as it's funny. Meanwhile, everyone else

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Brian
So far each april fools thread I've seen has had at least one buzzkiller in it. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote: Generally, I'm not a fan of this sort of joke. They give the impression of we get to break the rules when we want to, as long as it's funny.

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread WJhonson
In a message dated 4/1/2009 9:45:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, arrom...@rahul.net writes: (And WP:COI really does seem to say it's a conflict of interest for an article about the Earth to be made by Earthlings. If we really need the article to be made by people from other planets, I

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Casey Brown
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote: (And WP:COI really does seem to say it's a conflict of interest for an article about the Earth to be made by Earthlings.  It's easy to invoke IAR and say that that's not what it's supposed to mean, but it's not all that

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Sam Korn
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote: So far each april fools thread I've seen has had at least one buzzkiller in it. Personally, I've never understood why deliberately misleading people is supposed to be funny. I don't particularly enjoy having my time wasted

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Dan Dascalescu
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 13:08, Casey Brown cbrown1023...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote: (And WP:COI really does seem to say it's a conflict of interest for an article about the Earth to be made by Earthlings.  It's easy to invoke IAR and

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Chris Down
Don't get me wrong, I like April Fools, but there is so much unfunny stuff around... Man, whoever takes the cleanup job at the end of today has my condolences. - Chris On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Sam Korn smo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Brian

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread KillerChihuahua
George Herbert wrote: We have standards, people. {citeneeded} ___ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: [WikiEN-l] Earth Deletion Discussion

2009-04-01 Thread Dan Dascalescu
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 14:06, Casey Brown cbrown1023...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that's a sad reality. :-(  Wikipedians respond too crazily to COIs... what we usually suggest is that people don't tell others that they have first-hand knowledge. :-) Here is dmoz.org's policy on insider editors: