Does anyone think we can really get an actual consensus for anything
big anymore on en.wiki?
To take from Beeblebrox on the Signpost not too long ago
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-08-29/The_pending_changes_fiasco):
There seems inevitably to come a point in any
Possibly a really professional approach with full-time resources
devoted to explaining things and producing a detailed FAQ and managing
expectations to slowly build a consensus. But that jibes uncomfortably
with the approach where groups of volunteers try and produce the same
results. It also
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
It may seem a big goal, but perhaps en:wp can emulate the success of
en:wn. Will we achieve the best-practice level of seven layers of
review? We can but hope.
And in turn, I look forward to the study of the effects of
