On 18/11/2010, at 7:14, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Deniz Gultekin dgulte...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
MuZemike,
Bad feelings? We're learning more about our donors to maximize the
fundraising potential of our messages during the two month campaign.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Deniz Gultekin dgulte...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Wikipedians and Jedi-themed special effects?! *gets popcorn*
But yes, I agree, it'd be fantastic to have even more high quality
videos of editors *and* readers, with or without lightsabers.
On 10/6/10 6:05 PM,
2010/10/7 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On November 8, the Wikimedia Foundation will re-introduce banner ads.
And you'll see why 2010 won't be like ''2010''. (Cue shot of Erik
Möller staring at a monolith, which suddenly displays the
language-specific version of
Hi everyone,
I wanted to take a moment to bring you up to date on the planning of
the 2010-2011 fundraiser, and ask once again for your participation in
the process. Our updated meta pages
(http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2010
) will give you an overview as well. There's a
Is it me, or when I saw the word focus group, I started to develop
some bad feelings about this?
-MuZemike
On 10/5/2010 8:49 PM, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to take a moment to bring you up to date on the planning of
the 2010-2011 fundraiser, and ask once again for your
MuZemike,
Bad feelings? We're learning more about our donors to maximize the
fundraising potential of our messages during the two month campaign. We
have a lofty goal - and a short time period to accomplish it in.
-Deniz
On 10/6/10 1:03 PM, MuZemike wrote:
Is it me, or when I saw the word
On 10/6/2010 4:03 PM, MuZemike wrote:
Is it me, or when I saw the word focus group, I started to develop
some bad feelings about this?
-MuZemike
How so? We aren't basing the decisions on which banners to run on the
focus group (or survey for that matter). We're doing that on actual
click
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Maybe a video
clip montage of lots of different Wikipedia contributors talking for a
very short time?
Haha, like
http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/09/24/four-videos-of-wikipedias-volunteers/
? ;-)
--
Casey Brown
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Maybe a video
clip montage of lots of different Wikipedia contributors talking for a
very short time?
Haha, like
Wikipedians and Jedi-themed special effects?! *gets popcorn*
But yes, I agree, it'd be fantastic to have even more high quality
videos of editors *and* readers, with or without lightsabers.
On 10/6/10 6:05 PM, Carcharoth wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Casey Brownli...@caseybrown.org
I'm just saying that I know instances in which focus groups sometimes
don't accomplish what they're set to do. Apparently, Apple has gone
against this concept of doing focus groups to make decisions so they can
keep moving forward with various products (citation needed). Coca-Cola
did the same
11 matches
Mail list logo
