Jeneral Disclaimer: Do not believe everything you read, and only half of
what you see. All rights wronged. The sky is falling. All wrongs reversed.
May your doings return. Firestone's Law of Forecasting: Chicken Little only
has to be right once. The problem with being a lemming in the stock
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Jay Litwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manufacturing section?...that's {{howto}} or [wikiversity], isn't it? If
innocuous things like How to Clean a Fish Tank aren't here...
Not necessarily. Manufacturing processes can be incredibly
significant; consider the
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:46 PM, David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this one has been debated before and was considered to be
covered in the nest of disclaimers linked from the general disclaimer.
- d.
There's really two arguments here, a legal argument and a moral one.
Legally,
current entries were superior to those 90 days prior (p = 0.024).
First scientific proof that quality still is improving?
There's actually been a real study comparing different versions of
articles? Fantastic! We should encourage more of that.
___
On 11/25/08, Oskar Sigvardsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it would be a bad thing at all if at the dosage section of
an article on drugs we say Consult your physician before taking
medication
Funny thing, my meds say that right on the label (but damned if I pay
it any mind).
—C.W.
2008/11/25 David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So what will it take for us to get this switched on for en:wp?
Proof that having the sighted revision as the standard view (which you
have to for it to be meaningfully useful) doesn't result in a drop in
editing rate.
Proof that en would be able to
Proof that having the sighted revision as the standard view (which you
have to for it to be meaningfully useful) doesn't result in a drop in
editing rate.
Proof that en would be able to keep up with the required rate of
sighting (We have a hard time marking new pages as patrolled at the
2008/11/25 geni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/11/25 Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is only one way to prove any of that, though, and that's giving
it a go.
Not so. I assume we keep the not English wikipedias around for a reason.
Um, yeah, so that non-English speakers can read Wikipedia.
2008/11/25 geni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/11/25 Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But flagged revisions for currently protected pages is more wiki than
protected pages...
Given the historic grow rate of semi protect from replacement for full
protection in some cases to turning up all over the
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/25 geni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/11/25 Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But flagged revisions for currently protected pages is more wiki than
protected pages...
Given the historic grow rate of semi protect from
10 matches
Mail list logo
