[posted to commons-l and wikien-l; someone may want to forward it to
wikisource-l, perhaps?]
I've just run across this article, which might be of use in helping
those who work on the eternal problem of determining whether or not a
given 20th-century work is in copyright in the US.
2009/1/12 Andrew Gray shimg...@gmail.com:
[posted to commons-l and wikien-l; someone may want to forward it to
wikisource-l, perhaps?]
I've just run across this article, which might be of use in helping
those who work on the eternal problem of determining whether or not a
given 20th-century
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:14 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't use the copyright not renewed clause stuff and commons'
general support for Must be PD in the country of origin as well as the
US means we mostly dodge the issue.
We have in some cases used non-renewed that I've seen, but
That was an interesting read. Will read the full version soon. Especially
since I encountered some images a while ago where it was stated that the
copyright was not renewed. For people interested (and I would be glad to
have more opinions) see
2009/1/12 geni geni...@gmail.com:
I've just run across this article, which might be of use in helping
those who work on the eternal problem of determining whether or not a
given 20th-century work is in copyright in the US.
We don't use the copyright not renewed clause stuff and commons'
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
2009/1/12 geni geni...@gmail.com:
I've just run across this article, which might be of use in helping
those who work on the eternal problem of determining whether or not a
given 20th-century work is in copyright in
Andrew Gray wrote:
[posted to commons-l and wikien-l; someone may want to forward it to
wikisource-l, perhaps?]
I've just run across this article, which might be of use in helping
those who work on the eternal problem of determining whether or not a
given 20th-century work is in copyright
