Re: [WikiEN-l] List of the deleted articles (was: Administrator coup / mass deletions)

2010-01-25 Thread David Gerard
2010/1/25 Apoc 2400 apoc2...@gmail.com: The meme that unsourced articles are pure crap is just wrong. Some are quite well written, but by someone who didn't know (or care?) about our sourcing requirements. Well, yes. The problem with unsourced BLPs is that they're dangerous in ways that

Re: [WikiEN-l] List of the deleted articles (was: Administrator coup / mass deletions)

2010-01-25 Thread geni
2010/1/25 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com: 2010/1/25 Apoc 2400 apoc2...@gmail.com: The meme that unsourced articles are pure crap is just wrong. Some are quite well written, but by someone who didn't know (or care?) about our sourcing requirements. Well, yes. The problem with unsourced BLPs

Re: [WikiEN-l] List of the deleted articles (was: Administrator coup / mass deletions)

2010-01-25 Thread Charles Matthews
geni wrote: unsourced BLPs are not however dangerous in a way that sourced BLPs are not. Face it, slogans haven't got us very far in this discussion. A BLP that no one responsible has looked at is certainly dangerous in a way that a BLP that some one responsible has looked at may not be.

[WikiEN-l] List of the deleted articles (was: Administrator coup / mass deletions)

2010-01-24 Thread Apoc 2400
2010/1/21 David Gerard dgerard at gmail.com: Does anyone have a summary of the articles deleted in the present blood-crazed axe frenzy? Is there a list up? And/or a description of the general type of BLP deleted? I understand many were hardly-viewed articles with no edits in the last