Re Ian Woolard's query:
As the Wikipedia moves towards some arbitrary definition of notional
'completion', can anyone point to a board or mechanism in the
Wikipedia which is specifically for maintaining and ensuring technical
accuracy of articles?
I'm not sure who if anyone thinks we are
What I think is happening is that most of the articles (most of the
major topics) have been created, and most people, many of them newcomers
or laypeople, are not aware that anyone can come in and expand articles
that have been started but not finished - coincidentally about 1/3 or so
I
