On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, William Pietri wrote:
The problem is that even if you're only supposed to remove contentious
unsourced material, there's absolutely nothing anyone can do to you if you
remove noncontentious material.
I think it's reasonable to ask the remover if they're actually
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor seems to be going from article to article,
deleting every prose paragraph that doesn't have a ref tag (usually
everything except the intro sentence).
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor seems to be going from article to article,
deleting every prose paragraph that doesn't have a ref tag (usually
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Apoc 2400 wrote:
It is commonly said that anyone can remove unsourced information, and that
the burden lies on the editor who wants to include information to provide a
source. I have always taken this to mean that if I think something is wrong
or otherwise does not belong
Gwern Branwen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor seems to be going from article to article,
deleting every prose paragraph that
On 01/26/2010 01:18 PM, Ken Arromdee wrote:
The problem is that even if you're only supposed to remove contentious
unsourced material, there's absolutely nothing anyone can do to you if you
remove noncontentious material.
I think it's reasonable to ask the remover if they're actually
I've been checking our FAs, and they too contain unsourced material.
It is presumably sourced in the general references somewhere. The best
way of making such article totally unreadable would be to put inline
sources for every sentence. The only place I have ever seen it done is
some of the more
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Gwern Branwen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has lost the plot?
For example, this editor
Apoc 2400 wrote:
It is commonly said that anyone can remove unsourced information, and that
the burden lies on the editor who wants to include information to provide a
source. I have always taken this to mean that if I think something is wrong
or otherwise does not belong in the article, then
It is commonly said that anyone can remove unsourced information, and that
the burden lies on the editor who wants to include information to provide a
source. I have always taken this to mean that if I think something is wrong
or otherwise does not belong in the article, then I can remove it at
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Apoc 2400 apoc2...@gmail.com wrote:
It is commonly said that anyone can remove unsourced information, and that
the burden lies on the editor who wants to include information to provide a
source. I have always taken this to mean that if I think something is wrong
11 matches
Mail list logo
