Thinking on Emily's point about social interaction on wikipedia, I'm well aware
that the amount of interaction that I have with other editors varies
dramatically depending on the areas of the Wiki that I spend time in.
At one extreme reviewing at [[wp:FAC]] is very interactive and in my
At one extreme reviewing at [[wp:FAC]] is very interactive and in my
experience usually very collegial.
At the other extreme, when I'm feeling less sociable I find I can
while away hours eradicating preforming from the entertainment
industry or removing a surplus s to merge the Olympic
Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
I guess whatever floats their boat is what's best for them.
I notice, from time to time, that some wikiprojects I run across have
become inactive. It's
On WikiProjects: The performance of collaboration projects varies almost as
drastically as does the quality of Wikipedia's articles. At some ends, we
have some quite impressive organisations - such as WProj Military history -
that are very hands-on. At others, there are some quite useless projects
2009/6/19 Emily Monroe bluecalioc...@me.com:
Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
I guess whatever floats their boat is what's best for them.
I notice, from time to time, that some
Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
I guess whatever floats their boat is what's best for them.
I notice, from time to time, that some wikiprojects I run across have
become inactive. It's
