Re: [WikiEN-l] Citizendium charter ratified

2010-09-26 Thread Thomas Dalton
On 24 September 2010 12:41, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote: They need a USP (Sanger's involvement is not going to be at all relevant to that now). Well, they need a few things. But it prompts me to wonder what our USP is. You have heard of us doesn't count. Our USP is

Re: [WikiEN-l] Citizendium charter ratified

2010-09-26 Thread Carcharoth
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:  On 24/09/2010 12:28, David Gerard wrote: Citizendium is no longer Larry Sanger's personal project, but an independent group run by its community:

Re: [WikiEN-l] Citizendium charter ratified

2010-09-26 Thread Tony Sidaway
Thanks, somebody finally came out and gave the explanation without which this thread made very little sense. Of course Wikipedia's unique selling point is its enormous community of dedicated editors. Anybody could take a copy of our content, but maintaining it would require a living community and

Re: [WikiEN-l] Citizendium charter ratified

2010-09-26 Thread William Beutler
So what else is being sold? Citizendium and everything2? Britannica and Encarta? There are vast differences between Wikipedia and the aforementioned, and don't forget that Encarta is no more. Wikipedia's USP is that there is no other widely-recognized online repository of straightforward