On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 19 April 2012 16:01, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
I liked Andreas's way of putting this earlier:
Positive bias and advertorials *can* be odious, but activist editing with a
negative bent
On 21 April 2012 17:07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Historically this is inaccurate, as the article states, the original
phrasing was to abstain from doing harm, which is significantly
different insofar as it implies a willed action. This didn't at all
refer to medical
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:13 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2012 17:07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Historically this is inaccurate, as the article states, the original
phrasing was to abstain from doing harm, which is significantly
different
