this as a deliberate slight.
Fred
Fred, the point is that, if American women novelists is to be a
subcategory, then American male novelists would have to be a subcat too.
Otherwise the American novelists category would be default male, which is
apparently what happened.
Sarah
of sensitivity (if that
is the right word) would be the norm.
Sarah
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
articles related to that topic.
Sarah
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
attention to you.
That's basically what we're doing to people, and as with all things
reactions differ. Some are flattered, some don't mind, and some get
upset. It's not for us to say which reaction is correct, and that the
upset people are being irrational.
Sarah
we're going to ignore you.
Sarah
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:26 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:18 PM, David Goodman dgge...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be better to have a rule to never take the views of the
subject
.
Sarah
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 13:12, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
You just need to spend hours going through the edits and it will
doubtless be obvious enough. That we never noticed him, or identified
him, is not particularly surprising.
He was noticed and identified, which is what led
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:25, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never understood how academic publishers view these issues. I
have friends who had their PhDs published by their university presses
of someone paying $34 for an old article on such
an obscure issue are slim to vanishing, so the only consequence of the
high price is that no one gets to see it.
Sarah
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 15:57, Bob the Wikipedian
bobthewikiped...@gmail.com wrote:
Already been done, Conservapedia. The most disgusting mockery of
conservatives I've ever seen. Then again, isn't this one of the sites
Jimbo runs?
Definitely not.
___
it was this ability
to steer without micromanaging.
Sarah
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 05:38, Scott MacDonald
doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com wrote:
It fails our reliable source requirement.-- geni
Wow. Geni that's truly the remark that encapsulates exactly what's wrong
with BLPs, and the irresponsible attitude of Wikipedia.
Nevermind our many biased
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
The requirements are good if people apply them properly.
Self-published material by living persons is allowed in their bios, so
long as -- we know they wrote it; it's not unduly self-serving; and
they're talking about
possible there won't be 400 people wanting
accounts, so perhaps I should add another list to the sign-up page
not eligible, but would like one for the following reasons, in case
there are accounts left.
Sarah
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
served. The list will open on Wednesday, March 23 at
22:00 UTC, and will remain open for seven days. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CREDO
Feel free to add your name even if you're lower on the list than the
400th, in case people ahead of you aren't eligible.
Good luck!
Sarah
http
To be clear, John is not an OTRS agent. I believe he was saying that
he had checked with people who are agents (multiple sources) but
he's not one himself (though he is subscribed to the unblock-en-l
mailing list as a former admin).
On 8/30/10, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Mon,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Sarah Ewart wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:46 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
Where was Robert Corell's article previously? Perhaps my search was
inadequate but I didn't
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:46 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
Where was Robert Corell's article previously? Perhaps my search was
inadequate but I didn't find it looking quickly...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Corell
___
Steve, that image is now PD in Australia. In Australia, the copyright of
photographs taken prior to 1 January 1955 has expired and they are now in
the public domain. The template for using PD Australian images on Wikipedia
is here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Australia and Commons -
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.comwrote:
Is that date taken or date published? This is why provenance of
photographs (both photographer and publication details, and dates) is
important. You should also make clear *who* is saying that this
photograph was
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Dan Dascalescu
ddascalescu+wikipe...@gmail.com ddascalescu%2bwikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 06:23, elipo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is similar to the whole fair use brouhaha at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Madeleine_close2.jpg#Licence
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:54 AM, David Goodman dgoodma...@gmail.com wrote:
The nonsense this can lead to is visible in a current AfD,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Austin , where the nominator's
argument is that all the articles on all characters of the famous
australian soap opera
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:02 PM, [[User:Thinboy00]]
thinboy00+wikipedial...@gmail.com thinboy00%2bwikipedial...@gmail.comwrote:
so are we calling the police or not?
No, we aren't; it's up to the people who have been targets of death, rape
and violence threats and whose children have been
On 12/30/08, Marc Riddell michaeldavi...@comcast.net wrote:
Hey, guys! This whole thing could go away rather quickly if one (or more) of
the persons who feel victimized by him simply made a formal complaint to the
police.
Marc Riddell
I agree, Marc. I think we would find that most of this
I am not a lawyer so perhaps I say this in ignorance, however, I find it
hard to believe that the best way of handling this is by arguing that Jeremy
Hanson poses a public or common nuisance to the people of Virginia and
that we should ask local a judge to summon a special grand jury to
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:19 AM, Jay Litwyn brewh...@edmc.net wrote:
From: Sarah Ewart sarahew...@gmail.com:
I think the only options remaining are to start reporting him to the
police.
If anyone else wants to know which police to contact, then these few things
might be useful. Basically
27 matches
Mail list logo
