On 23/08/2011 19:54, Ken Arromdee wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Charles Matthews wrote:
But bias of the kind he works with is a really unhelpful concept for
us, in practice: especially when trivialised by being metricated.
What other way is there to claim bias than being metricated? Is he
I hadn't heard of Hudong before. This article by Rebecca Fannin calls
it China's Wikipedia and says it has a 95% market share and more
than 5 million entries from 3.6 million contributors.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccafannin/2011/08/23/why-draper-funded-chinas-wikipedia/
English Wikipedia
I hadn't heard of Hudong before. This article by Rebecca Fannin calls
it China's Wikipedia and says it has a 95% market share and more
than 5 million entries from 3.6 million contributors.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccafannin/2011/08/23/why-draper-funded-chinas-wikipedia/
English
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
I hadn't heard of Hudong before. This article by Rebecca Fannin calls
it China's Wikipedia and says it has a 95% market share and more
than 5 million entries from 3.6 million contributors.
Hi,
There's a company operating in the UK that has a large number of
controversies attached to it.
Because this mail will be publicly viewable/searchable (and for other
reasons that may become clearer as you read on) I shan't name them.
The article for the company already has a substantive
In my opinion, from an ethical standpoint, there is minimal or no
difference between editing as Bod NotBod and editing as an IP
address.
To answer your second question, unless Bod NotBod is your real name
using your IP address makes it more likely (not less) that your
identity will be traced and
On 24 August 2011 23:20, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Is it ever acceptable to purposely edit an article when logged out
(ie, as an IP) if one has an account of long standing?
Yes.
2. If I did this IP editing, would I have [ complete / little / no ]
protection from being traced
Thank you Nathan and Geni,
Nathan I may take you up on your offer. But using a library computer
is another option I had been considering.
It's gone midnight here now, so I'll sleep on it.
Thank you once again,
Bodnotbod.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
I think one key question is whether you have already edited this article in
such a way that this sockpuppetry might verge into abusive sockpuppetry -
i.e. two accounts that appear to support each others arguments/edits being
secretly controlled by the same person. If not, or if your only edits to
On 25 August 2011 00:31, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I'd suggest rereading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock and
notifying Arbcom of your alt account,
No reason to notify arbcom. If there account is an abusive sock it
won't help you and if it isn't arbcom
On 08/24/11 3:30 PM, Nathan wrote:
Fourth, it's hard to say without understanding more exactly what kind
of threat you are under. Probably I'd do it myself anyway, but that's
a purely personal decision. Failing that, you could provide the
referencing information to someone else and have them
I think that it is also worth pointing out that, in my experience, articles
on Hudong are pretty bad. They are poorly formatted, poorly written,
generally lack inline referencing, and often have copyright violations.
Baidu Baike is of somewhat higher quality, though I think that both pale in
12 matches
Mail list logo
