On 3/14/06, Gion Hosang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hoi Manuel
Es hat noch niemand damit angefangen. Wir sammeln alle
Übersetzungen im Wikimedia CH-Wiki, daher bietet es sich für
Dich an hier loszulegen:
Na dann lege ich los. Ich werde die fertige Übersetzung dann ins Netz
stellen.
Hello,
just as a summary for the thread Rumantsch Grischun in German: Gion
has mentioned his intention to translate our bylaws into Rumantsch
Grischun and he will post them afterwards at [[Bylaws/Rm]]. By the
way, is there anybody who would translate the bylaws into French, as
Emanuel had to give
Ok, it's very complicated :(
I will ask to a translation center (I have some friends) to have a
look to the translations made by ourselves. I can have this
verification without costs for Wikimedia CH.
Almost this (informal) verification could arrange a lists of
ambiguities before the Wikimedia
Looking at the latest changes on the CH wiki... is it on purpose that
the current resolutions look as formal as a UN Security Council
resolution ? RESOLVED... AND... FURTHER RESOLVED... so proposed on the
fifteenth of March 2006. I know it is borderline to hairsplitting, but
this makes the
Fine, it seems that we're soonable topost the bylaws in all 5 languages! Hopefully, this means the beginning of areally plurilingual association that we're aiming to become.
From:Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:Mailing list for Wikimedia Swizerland wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.orgTo:Mailing
I agree with Frederic
I know that several actions must be done BEFORE the real foundation, but I still
do not see why we need a special post address BEFORE the foundation - and even
after the foundation, since we do not expect a bunch of mail. And as long there
is no founded association, we all
Hi together,
just some words why such resolutions (or name them how you'd like) are
necessary:
I know that several actions must be done BEFORE the real foundation, but I
still do not see why we need a special post address BEFORE the foundation -
and even after the foundation, since we do not
Looking at the latest changes on the CH wiki... is it on purpose that
the current resolutions look as formal as a UN Security Council
resolution ? RESOLVED... AND... FURTHER RESOLVED... so proposed on the
fifteenth of March 2006. I know it is borderline to hairsplitting, but
this makes the
Lugano - the sunny capital :)
On 3/15/06, Jürg Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So there are even other cities possible:
* Zurich - the economic capital of CH
* Berne - the political capital of CH of home affairs
* Geneva - the political capital of CH of foreign affairs
* Lucerne - the
Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] wrote:
The thing is, that there are legal actions that have to be done now in
preparation of the founding of Wikimedia CH and the Wikipedia Day, such as
registering / transfering domain names (wikipedia.ch, wikimedia.ch etc.),
contracts which have to been
Jürg Wolf wrote:
Is it also foreseen to open a bank account? And if - in which place? And when?
In whose name? At which bank?
When: not before the association is created. One needs a copy of the
bylaws, and the minutes of the first general meeting to open an
account (specifying who has
Ilario Valdelli wrote:
I don't undestand. Do you mean that pages are blocked to no-sysop
members? It seems to have a sense because when a board (or preliminary
board) take a decision it's important to communicate this decision
(also with grammatical errors). If a no-board person makes a
Which bank: Postfinance looks like a good option to me, if only because
it is easy to give a postal account number to anyone for donations, such
as 12-345678-9, instead of having to say Bank such and such, account
A-BCDEFGH-I. All the associations I know of use a Yellow account as
their main
Of course, your argument makes perfect sense. But being an association
that promotes Wikipedia and other Wiki-based projects, I would like to
think that we can do without the permanent protections, only with a
banner saying This is a resolution voted by the board, and should not
be modified
Now there seems to be a big discussion going on here and I would like
to clarify a few points as the resolutions come from me and Nando:
1. Why we need resolutions:
a) We want to create as soon as a wikimedia.ch, which is intended
for the public. We want to stop using ch.wikimedia.org, because
I'm sorry for my recent postings because they were a bit sarcastic a maybe not
clearly defaced as zynical.
My opinion in this whole thing is:
1) If our preliminary board thinks, we need a special postal address - I'm OK
with it because I don't have the whole view. And on the meeting last year we
Am I correct in thinking that ff. in
ein Verein gemäss Artikel 60 ff. des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches.
means and following ?
Frederic
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
Am 16.03.06 schrieb Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am I correct in thinking that ff. in ein Verein gemäss Artikel 60 ff. des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches.means and following ?
Yes, this is correct.
Nando
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
2006/3/15, Jürg Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My opinion in this whole thing is:1) If our preliminary board thinks, we need a special postal address - I'm OKwith it because I don't have the whole view. And on the meeting last year wegave you the mandate and the power to operate towards the swiss
Thanks Michael!
4. About page protectionWe have a wiki. A wiki means everybody can edit, at Wikimedia CH only
people logged in.But, there are 2 reasons which are imho pro blocking some pages:a)www.wikimedia.ch, which is redirecting to our wiki, is mentioned atthe bottom of the Weltwoche article
20 matches
Mail list logo