Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-29 Thread Hisham
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Ashwin Baindur wrote: Now, I want to raise another point. Do we really have the wherewithal for a 5 article collaboration? I think that is too optimistic, perhaps we should have a two article collaboration to begin with each month? My personal view is that any

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-29 Thread Naveen Francis
It may not work :( Tried earlier http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Collaborations_of_the_month -- naveenpf On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ashwin Baindur ashwin.bain...@gmail.comwrote: Now, I want to raise another point. Do we really have the wherewithal for a 5 article collaboration? I think

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-29 Thread Hisham
On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Naveen Francis wrote: It may not work :( Tried earlier http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Collaborations_of_the_month -- naveenpf if at first you don't suceed... :-) btw, today I read an article yesterday about Ratan Tata and how he institutionalized an

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-29 Thread Srikanth Ramakrishnan
Hey, I'm really optimistic, that we can go forward with this. Seeing the number of English editors is on a rise and enthusiasm of several people, especially Pradeep Mohandas, I'm really sure that this will and shall work. ---Regards, On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Hisham his...@wikimedia.org

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-29 Thread Ashwin Baindur
Naveen, I think COTM is not the place where red links can be developed into stubs, start of even B class articles. The final outcome that we can hope for is that certain articles are : * Raised to FA/GA quality if not status (or at least) * Get improved by numerous edits (or at least) * Get

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-29 Thread wheredevelsdare
is the Mumbai article which was demoted and has now reattained GA status. Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:06:18 +0530 From: ashwin.bain...@gmail.com To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011 Naveen, I think COTM

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-29 Thread Pradeep Mohandas
...@gmail.com To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011 Thanks for the suggestion, Srikanth . Did that. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANoticeboard_for_India-related_topicsaction

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Required - articles for Collaboration of the Month Dec 2011

2011-11-28 Thread Srikanth Ramakrishnan
Naveen, I believe INCOTM is happening after two and a half years. Remember Transport in India ??? To everyone else, this is an excellent opportunity to start and get a good section of high quality India articles. This has been VERY successful in the past, as I have PERSONALLY seen. I once