I was very pleased to find this in the release notes for Mediawiki 1.20
getting the Mediawiki message out there with the huge Linux userbase.
***
We're working closely with Linux distributors to make sure that the
MediaWiki bundled in Linux is something
Hello everyone,
I have one space remaining for this. If you'd like to take part please do
let me know soon.
Thank you,
Stevie
On 31 October 2012 17:17, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
Thank you for the clarification.
There are no plans to introduce a group known as
Sgn me up Stevie!
On 13 November 2012 09:53, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
Hello everyone,
I have one space remaining for this. If you'd like to take part please do
let me know soon.
Thank you,
Stevie
On 31 October 2012 17:17, Stevie Benton
According to the Times, the reverted edits referred to were made by
212.161.34.130. Looking through the history of the article, the relevant diffs
seem to be:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alisher_Usmanovdiff=379790641oldid=377970394
and
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
According to the Times, the reverted edits referred to were made by
212.161.34.130. Looking through the history of the article, the relevant
diffs seem to be:
On 13 November 2012 20:59, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
According to the Times, the reverted edits referred to were made by
212.161.34.130. Looking through the history of the article, the relevant
diffs seem to be:
BTW - if you can get a copy of yesterday's Times, you
On 13 Nov 2012, at 21:16, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
(It's such a pity the Times really doesn't want its stuff widely read
on the net, i.e. by the people who would be most interested in this.)
I completely agree. It's very scary that the Daily Mail is more accessible than
the
Along with MSN News, the Daily Mail is in fact the most read news source in
the English speaking world, according to this article:
http://www.nouse.co.uk/2012/11/12/the-daily-mail-lolcats-with-a-masthead/
I don't know whether that is just online, or the combined number of online
and print
Hi all,
I found this a bit comical:
http://www.prweek.com/uk/news/1159206/pr-industry-blames-cumbersome-wikipedia-finsbury-editing-issue/
They don't get it that the COI policy affects everyone.
They think that just because they want people to pay them to change the
articles they should be
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:14 PM, fab...@unpopular.org.uk wrote:
Hi all,
I found this a bit comical:
http://www.prweek.com/uk/news/1159206/pr-industry-blames-cumbersome-wikipedia-finsbury-editing-issue/
They don't get it that the COI policy affects everyone.
They think that just because
Dear Andreas
Francis Ingham is DG of the PRCA. Its fee-paying members include RLM
Finsbury (among other WPP companies), so, ultimately, it contributes to his
salary. Possible COI?
Paul
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Paul Wilkinson paul.wilkin...@pwcom.co.uk
wrote:
Dear Andreas
Francis Ingham is DG of the PRCA. Its fee-paying members include RLM
Finsbury (among other WPP companies), so, ultimately, it contributes to his
salary. Possible COI?
Paul
Come on, you are a
The OTRS Quality queue is again over 200, which is pretty worrying.
Partially my fault as I haven't been doing much if any OTRS work recently.
Doug
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:31 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
