Tom Holden wrote:
Hi all,
We are considering cutting the membership fee to £5 flat. (It is
currently £12 waged, £6 unwaged.)
We would like to expand membership before the AGM and we feel cutting
the membership fee will help with this. It will also simplify our
administration.
Well, but it should nonetheless be sufficient to reduce the chance that people
sign up for a joke or similar. Particularly when combined with the cost of
getting to the AGM etc. How strongly do you feel about this? Is £12/£6 actually
any better?
-Original Message-
From:
On 17 February 2010 15:59, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
So, what signal does this send? For me, nothing very positive about the
organisation. Setting a price below a typical cinema ticket isn't really
a claim on anyone's respect.
The idea is that members join to
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 17 February 2010 15:59, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
So, what signal does this send? For me, nothing very positive about the
organisation. Setting a price below a typical cinema ticket isn't really
a claim on anyone's respect.
The
On 17 February 2010 22:15, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
The logic of soliciting donations is always that if there is more money,
more can be done. Money doesn't make the world of the WMF go round, but
in the real world money tends to be given to those who show they
