[Wikitech-l] Lightweight Wiki?

Can anyone recommend a really lightweight Wiki? Preferably PHP but flat file would be considered too. Thanks ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Lightweight Wiki?

Dawson schrieb: Can anyone recommend a really lightweight Wiki? Preferably PHP but flat file would be considered too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software http://www.wikimatrix.org/ http://freewiki.info/ -- daniel ___

Re: [Wikitech-l] Lightweight Wiki?

dokuwiki looks good 2009/2/3 Dawson costel...@gmail.com Can anyone recommend a really lightweight Wiki? Preferably PHP but flat file would be considered too. Thanks ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Wikitech-l] Lightweight Wiki?

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Dawson costel...@gmail.com wrote: Can anyone recommend a really lightweight Wiki? Preferably PHP but flat file would be considered too. LionWiki ( http://lionwiki.0o.cz/ ) is pretty good. see it working - http://alnokta.arablug.org/ -- --alnokta

Re: [Wikitech-l] Interwiki recommendations

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.comwrote: Hoi, Have a look at this: http://www.omegawiki.org/Expression:Nederland This is structured data It can be shown in multiple languages. It does allow for interwiki links... It already works with MediaWiki ... So

Re: [Wikitech-l] – Fixing {val}

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Artur Fijałkowski wiki.w...@gmail.com wrote: If anyone want to be sure that floor(4...) == 5 he should use floor(round()) not floor(). That defeats the point of using floor(). It would turn 4.6 into 5 also. In fact, floor(round(x)) is exactly the same

Re: [Wikitech-l] Interwiki recommendations

Gerard Meijssen hett schreven: Hoi, Have a look at this: http://www.omegawiki.org/Expression:Nederland This is structured data It can be shown in multiple languages. It does allow for interwiki links... It already works with MediaWiki ... So the question is, why re-invent the wheel ?

Re: [Wikitech-l] Interwiki recommendations

Gerard Meijssen schreef: Hoi, Have a look at this: http://www.omegawiki.org/Expression:Nederland This is structured data It can be shown in multiple languages. It does allow for interwiki links... It already works with MediaWiki ... So the question is, why re-invent the wheel ? I think the

Re: [Wikitech-l] – Fixing {val}

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Garrett and...@epstone.net wrote: About ten minutes. The question is not one of developer time, but one of whether we actually want a character-cannon (I'm not quite clear on what that is, but I'm assuming it's a string-functions expansion of wikitext),

Re: [Wikitech-l] Interwiki recommendations

hmm ... my feeling is that it would be easier to adapt semantic wiki to include language aliasing than adapt omega wiki to be less dictionary centric in the context of a shared structured data site with _lossy_ defined community ontologies... But fundamentally there is no reason why an

Re: [Wikitech-l] Interwiki recommendations

Michael Dale wrote: We really need a wikidata type site. A very easy and ugly workaround would be to store an image on Wikimedia Commons, containting the letters Barack Obama and having the filename President_of_USA.png. Next time change comes to the White House, the image is replaced with

Re: [Wikitech-l] – Fixing {val}

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, greg_l_at_wikipedia greg_l_at_wikipe...@comcast.net wrote: How long would it take a good coder to write a bullet-proof character- cannon? Also… About ten minutes. The question is not one of developer time, but one of whether we actually want a character-cannon

Re: [Wikitech-l] Interwiki recommendations

Hoi, I really like Semantic MediaWiki. But horses for courses. SMW is great for content where articles exist within one MediaWiki installation. It is TRULY project based. OmegaWiki is data that is indeed a separate database. The reason for a separate database is exactly because you do not want to

[Wikitech-l] how about form action=?

Gentlemen, I notice several places where the code makes form action=... URIs where the result would just be the default URI anyway. Perhaps one could just get away with form action= in those cases? http://www.thefutureoftheweb.com/blog/use-empty-form-action-submit-to-current