On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:30 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
KP == K Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au writes:
KP http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:ExtensionDistributor/SpamBlacklist
OK, I tried it, but
Download MediaWiki extension
From MediaWiki.org
Invalid response from remote
Robert Ullmann wrote:
All servers should be monitored, on several levels (ping, various
queries, checking processes)
Nagios should have been monitoring them.
Someone should be watching the monitor 24x7. (being right there, or
by SMS, whatever ;)
Don't know if there can be a nagios silent
2009/2/24 jida...@jidanni.org:
Hello, say, when we are running our link checker programs and see
HEAD http://en.wikipedia.org/ -- 301 Moved Permanently
HEAD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page -- 200 OK
HEAD http://wikimania2007.wikimedia.org/ -- 301 Moved Permanently
HEAD
2009/2/24 Robert Ullmann rlullm...@gmail.com:
When a server is reported down (in this case hard; won't reply to
ping) it should be physically looked at within minutes.
Is there anyone within minutes of the servers at all times? Aren't
they at a remote data centre?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anyone within minutes of the servers at all times? Aren't
they at a remote data centre?
Isn't Rob on-site?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Hoi,
Is there also a Rob in Amsterdam and Seoul ?
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/2/24 Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.comsimetrical%2bwikil...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anyone within minutes of the servers at all
Yes performance does improve a great deal as the browsers pre-fetch in
parallel. Its definitely a long overdue feature for browsers :)
But it will still should be more efficient / faster to do one request
instead of many in parallel. Even with parallel fetching the default in
the Firefox
On 2/22/09 5:52 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
You must excuse me but if you take a look in
mediawiki-1.14.0rc1/languages/messages/MessagesRu.php
there's this hundreds of bytes long string of z's etc. at $bookstoreList.
Looks like somebody cut-n-pasted a URL that includes some session info
or
I've made some customizations to OpenID selector code (
http://code.google.com/p/openid-selector/) and combined it with MediaWiki
OpenID extension, you can see the result here:
http://www.sharingbuttons.org/Special:OpenIDLogin
Iwant to check it in back into the repository, but it uses New BSD
Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote in message
news:49a42729.4070...@wikimedia.org...
Quick update on dump status:
* Dumps are back up and running on srv31, the old dump batch host.
Please note that unlike the wikis sites themselves, dump activity is
*not* considered time-critical --
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Chernyshev
sergey.chernys...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made some customizations to OpenID selector code (
http://code.google.com/p/openid-selector/) and combined it with MediaWiki
OpenID extension, you can see the result here:
Great - thanks for the license clarification, I don't think I was too
excited to re-implement selector.
Good point about logos - so what do we do with this? How do we make sure all
those logos (including OpenID, BTW) are properly licensed? I don't think
original developer thought about that
Hoi,
Be glad that the original developer chose the BSD license. From a
perspective of being able to cooperate widely, the BSD license is vastly
superior to the GPL. It is for this reason that I urge you to develop first
the BSD software and back-port to a GPL'd version. Then again as long as you
Sorry, CC-ed wrong Wikimedia list originally. Please use these lists for
discussion:
gene...@openid.net, le...@openid.net, Wikimedia developers
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
Thank you,
Sergey
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sergey Chernyshev
I sent an email to OpenID general and legal lists CC-ing this list - not
sure how we should go about it, but I'll definitely delay UI release until I
get some initial understanding of potential solution (it's sort-of weird to
have good UI without images).
Sergey
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
The notion that trade marked logos are problematic is true for a specific
strict understanding of the GPL license as is prevalent under people who
adhere to the Debian way of thinking. It is definetly not
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Sergey Chernyshev
sergey.chernys...@gmail.com wrote:
I sent an email to OpenID general and legal lists CC-ing this list - not
sure how we should go about it, but I'll definitely delay UI release until I
get some initial understanding of potential solution (it's
As mentioned already, I'm not sure if localization is the best for candidate
for being held in JavaScript, but other things mentioned, e.g. single
request, minified and infinitely cached JS is what I'm looking at for
overall MW infrastructure - so far it's a big performance problem for MW -
Hoi,
Sergey, you may also want to take a visit at the folks at
http://translatewiki.net. This is where the internationalisation and
localisation effort for MediaWiki and its extensions and all the rest is
concentrated. In the past translatewiki,net has been instrumental in
bringing best practices
On 2/24/09 4:17 PM, Sergey Chernyshev wrote:
As mentioned already, I'm not sure if localization is the best for candidate
for being held in JavaScript, but other things mentioned, e.g. single
request, minified and infinitely cached JS is what I'm looking at for
overall MW infrastructure - so
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Sergey Chernyshev
sergey.chernys...@gmail.com wrote:
How do we go about doing this? Can it be tied into Usability project (
http://usability.wikimedia.org/)?
It doesn't seem usability-related. If you have commit access, you
could just start committing code
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
IANAL
My impression is that this is just as legal as referring to a company by
name -- it's not an infringement to use someone's trademark to *refer to
them*, whereas it is to *use the mark or something overly similar to
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
The notion that trade marked logos are problematic is true for a specific
strict understanding of the GPL license as is prevalent under people who
adhere to the Debian way of thinking. It is
23 matches
Mail list logo
