On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This thread has probably reached that limit of fresh arguments. Can we
continue with proper documentation, reporting and patches?
We care about GitHub and we believe it is an important source of potential
contributors. This
fixing bug 32621 is a todo. The first attempt failed and some tweaks
are needed to use the PathRouter to fix that bug.
PathRouter allows for the use of custom paths to expand.
NamespacePaths is an example of one thing you can do (say giving
Help: pages a /help/ path) but you could also apply
And what is the point of making pretty urls in case of MediaWiki?
I think they're already pretty much pretty in MediaWiki :)
/edit/$1 is slightly prettier than ?action=edit, but as I understand it
doesn't affect anything, even like SEO.
And I don't think /help/$1 is any better than /Help:$1 at
Hi Niklas,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:54:05AM +0200, Niklas Laxström wrote:
On 14 March 2013 01:07, Christian Aistleitner
christ...@quelltextlich.at wrote:
Queries are just a grep away, and setting them can be done through git
as well, until we integrate that into gerrit.
Except that you
Hello,
I am going to teach a graduate-level course on quantum physics (quantum
simulation) at the University of Hannover, Germany. At the moment, I am
evaluating Wikiversity for collaboration with other lecturers and
students on the creation of lecture notes.
As the notes will contain a
Hello Hendrik,
On 03/15/2013 08:15 AM, Hendrik Weimer wrote:
As the notes will contain a significant amount of mathematical content,
it would be extremely useful to export into LaTeX format for
distributing printed copies. As far as I know, the Wiki2LaTeX extension
to MediaWiki [1] provides
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Hendrik Weimer
hwei...@itp.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Hello,
I am going to teach a graduate-level course on quantum physics (quantum
simulation) at the University of Hannover, Germany. At the moment, I am
evaluating Wikiversity for collaboration with other
I done some testing of the performance of Lua-based templates as
deployed on enwiki. This analysis is summarized at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dragons_flight/Lua_performance
The bottom line is that Lua is fast, and often much faster than the
template coding it replaces.
For the
As proposed here some time ago, the focus of the next QA weekly goal
will be old LiquidThreads bugs.
Starting on March 18, 2013 and all week long with a dedicated session on
March 19, we're cleaning up the bug reports about Extension:LiquidThreads.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:08 PM, bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a large extension, which means the review effort would be
non-trivial (Although just looking at it, I noticed a couple lines
which look suspicious). Its probably unlikely to be deployed unless
people _really_ wanted
Hello all,
This is related to the ongoing tagging in Gerrit/Bugzilla thread, but I
wanted to make it a separate one so it is more easily seen.
Request: For anything in Gerrit that you feel is scaptrap worthy, please
add me to the reviewers list. That way I can keep a record of them and
you don't
Thank you. Meanwhile fixed planet updates via live hack. See ticket for details.
--
Daniel Zahn dz...@wikimedia.org
Operations Engineer
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Hello everyone,
This is your weekly preview of higher-risk or general you should be
aware of items for the slew of deployments coming in the near term.
== During the week of March 18th: ==
* AFTv5 is continuing their rollout of new features and schema changes
on Tuesday
* E2 and E3 are
Hello! So I tried converting
https://github.com/wikimedia/qa-browsertests/pull/1 into a Gerrit changeset
(https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/54097/) , and was mostly successful. It
is also a relatively painless process - at least for single commits.
This assumes you (person doing the GitHub -
On 03/14/2013 08:36 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
And I wouldn't be too quick to celebrate the increased vendor lock-in
of a large percentage of the open source community into an ecosystem
of partially proprietary tools and services (the GitHub engine itself,
the official GitHub applications, etc.).
Greg Grossmeier wrote:
Read this:
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Lightning_deployments
Hi.
Looks pretty good. My only tweak was changing the IRC channel to
#wikimedia-tech. It's an old and established channel and seems like a
perfect fit for this. :-)
We'll likely never really move away
16 matches
Mail list logo
