Le 23/04/13 04:27, MZMcBride a écrit :
Add a music wikimodule
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Congrats to all involved in getting bug 189 resolved! :-)
I think that deserves an official press release by the WMF :-D
Congratulations to everyone involved!
--
Antoine
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:00 AM, reporter repor...@kaulen.wikimedia.orgwrote:
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for April 15, 2013 - April 22, 2013
Fresh charts:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bugzilla_Weekly_Report
Željko
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Before joining us, Erik was a web developer and operational
jack-of-all-trades at Cite Media/Maverick Media which is a custom Symfony2
CRM working on “what the internet is for”[1]. There he worked on MySQL,
Redis, Graylog2, ElasticSearch, Nginx w/PHP-FPM integration, phpUnderControl
and
Hello,
I have found an issue with mediawiki jquery.IME and have reported it on
Github. https://github.com/wikimedia/jquery.ime/issues/163
I am already working on it and will create a patch with my solution soon.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:58 PM, KAUSHAL SINGH kaushal.sing...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Kausal. Looking forward to your pull request!
--
Siebrand Mazeland
M: +31 6 50 69 1239
Skype: siebrand
Op 23 apr. 2013 om 14:13 heeft KAUSHAL SINGH kaushal.sing...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
Hello,
I have found an issue with mediawiki jquery.IME and have reported it on
Hey Quim,
I have drafted my proposal on my User
pagehttps://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Anubhav_iitr.
I have already opened a bug in mediawiki for the Extension request in
bugzilla. Here is the
linkhttps://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47207.
I will be glad to have your feedback.
Can
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an extra tab for a specific type of article that shows some additional
information about this article. This view is per article. It does
Can it not in some way be included in action=info ?
DJ
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
Hey,
Can it not in some way be included in action=info ?
In this case: no. That is however sidestepping my question :)
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On 23.04.2013 14:46, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an extra tab for a specific type of article that shows some additional
information about
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an extra tab for a specific type of article that shows
Here's my take on it:
From the design perspective, SpecialPages are superior. It's one of the
most mature controlling units in MediaWiki, primarily because current
special pages do so many complex things there has developed a need for
abstraction that handles many use cases. Actions, on the other
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 05:46:31 -0700, Jeroen De Dauw
jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask
if I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case.
So is one approach preferred?
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 06:07:15 -0700, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de
wrote:
On 23.04.2013 14:46, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to
ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 20:11 +0100, Jan Luca wrote:
is there already a schedule to update jQuery and jQuery UI to 1.9 or are
there problems at moment? I want to use the new tooltip widget of jQuery UI
1.9 [1].
FYI, the corresponding bug reports are:
This is really amazing! Specially for Wikisource :-)
Is multi-page score transclusion with Extension:Proofread page able to
generate a global midi/score file or each page has to be treated as an
independent entity?
Micru
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Apparently Facebook has been experimenting with sending WebP images in
place of JPEG to some users... but there are some usability problems
reported in the tech press
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/04/chicken-meets-egg-with-facebook-chrome-webp-support/
Primary problem seems
I vaguely recall the first time I came across one of these newfangled PNG
images that no viewer would display. What's wrong with GIF??? That will
never stand!
(yes, I know plenty is wrong with GIF, especially in those days...)
Pixelmator on Mac already opens webp fine, didn't test saving though.
For wider distribution!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:13 AM
Subject: [WikimediaMobile] Rethinking MobileFormatter / Skins
To: mobile-l mobil...@lists.wikimedia.org
I've been playing around with skins a lot recently.
On 04/23/2013 05:42 AM, anubhav agarwal wrote:
Hey Quim,
I have drafted my proposal on my User
pagehttps://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Anubhav_iitr.
I have already opened a bug in mediawiki for the Extension request in
bugzilla. Here is the
I was experimenting with using the onOutputPageParserOutput hook [1]
(running based on the current skin) and think it might be a better
approach to run the transformations on smaller chunks of data. For
instance the table of contents is known to be in the lead section so
it seems like it would be
Thank you Teresa for your reply, spot on.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Teresa Cho tcho...@gmail.com wrote:
Mine is pretty sparse and not the best example of a good proposal.
It was good enough to get you acepted in the previous OPW round.
Thanks to Lydia we have now a link to a collection
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
Not sure what's a good solution for this, other than a really good
download/sharing UI on images...
Maybe the most obvious solution would be for Mozilla and Microsoft and
the usual bunch of image editors to start supporting
Hello everyone,
I apologize. I didn’t realize that it helps to announce long-term contractors
also. ;-) It’s with great pleasure that I’m announcing that Nischay Nahata has
joined the Wikimedia Foundation as a Features Engineering Contractor (only six
months ago). He expects to get his B.Tech
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:06:13 -0700, Yuvi Panda yuvipa...@gmail.com wrote:
For wider distribution!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:13 AM
Subject: [WikimediaMobile] Rethinking MobileFormatter / Skins
To: mobile-l
Thanks for pointing out the __TOC__ magic word. Out of interest - for
what reason do we support this? It seems like a bad thing to allow
inconsistencies between page content on the same wiki. If a table of
contents is in the lead section for one article but in the third
section for another article
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the __TOC__ magic word. Out of interest - for
what reason do we support this? It seems like a bad thing to allow
inconsistencies between page content on the same wiki. If a table of
contents is in
Daniel
Great to hear I'm not alone in my thoughts. Things like the edit
section link shouldn't have to be hacked in at the parser level - if
the parser returned the components of a page it would be trivial for
the skin to add these itself.
The fact you are resorting to hacks to do things which
For now my user page is under development. Please bear with this format
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
It's an interesting idea. Though it won't be trivial. But we could start
to express the parser output of pages as high level components nested in
each other. Like a document with a TOC nested in it, as well as high-level
headers (or maybe sections), emeded image frames, etc... where things
On 04/23/2013 03:23 PM, Vishal Thukral wrote:
For now my user page is under development. Please bear with this format
You didn't include a link to your user page.
Matt Flaschen
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 04/23/2013 02:36 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Thanks to Lydia we have now a link to a collection of real good GSoC
proposals:
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Iqk8MTix2CN1pAgqhZqhefKTwiA7P73zQH9N46lvyB0
It's not critical. But of course it would also be nice to have some
MediaWiki
On 04/23/2013 09:58 AM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
Mind pointing out what is messy about special pages? If you've got an
actual issue with them some of us would probably like to actually fix it.
Cause actions were in fact the older interface. Till one or two people
attempted to bring them up to
Hello all,
This message is for those of you who do deployments to the WMF cluster.
On the [[How to deploy code]] wikitech page, there is a section on
Testing your live code:
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/How_to_deploy_code#Test_your_code_live
That's a pretty basic overview of it and it
On 04/23/2013 01:04 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
On 04/23/2013 02:36 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Thanks to Lydia we have now a link to a collection of real good GSoC
proposals:
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Iqk8MTix2CN1pAgqhZqhefKTwiA7P73zQH9N46lvyB0
Good point! And thanks to the prompt
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Greg Grossmeier wrote:
Hello all,
This message is for those of you who do deployments to the WMF cluster.
On the [[How to deploy code]] wikitech page, there is a section on
Testing your live code:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:07:20 -0700, Matthew Flaschen
mflasc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 04/23/2013 09:58 AM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
Mind pointing out what is messy about special pages? If you've got an
actual issue with them some of us would probably like to actually fix
it.
Cause actions
Hey,
Perhaps I have some misconceptions here, but was the Action class not
recently (~1.18) introduced, and is it not required to use actions to
specify behaviours for alternate content models?
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--
So I've been trying to implement the suggestions and I think I'm one step
away from seeing results. I've got Wikibase and all its dependancies set
up, I've got mobile frontend installed (but commented out for the moment).
I can't figure out how to get some Wikidata style data on to my local
Dear all,
I have started a new RFC with some proposals for the interproject links and
you can add more if you want.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Interproject_links_interface
It has been a long standing issue and one of the most voted enhancements in
Bugzilla
Thanks for all the feedback to my proposal. I really appreciate it.
If we want to provide personalized recommendations, user data does need to
be connected for the best results, and yeah things could probably get a
little iffy with the privacy policy.
In terms of gathering data for the
Hi folks,
I'd like to start a broader conversation about language support in MW
core, and the potential need to re-think some pretty fundamental
design decisions in MediaWiki if we want to move past the point of
diminishing returns in some language-related improvements.
In a nutshell, is it time
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:02:56 -0700, Jeroen De Dauw
jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Perhaps I have some misconceptions here, but was the Action class not
recently (~1.18) introduced, and is it not required to use actions to
specify behaviours for alternate content models?
Cheers
--
On 04/23/2013 07:35 PM, Cheng Xing wrote:
Because of the privacy policy, (1) and (2) are out of the game. The third
one might get around this issue, though.
3) Facebook App
From a privacy point of view a Facebook is a lot worse, since your data
goes to a 3rd party instead of staying in
I am wishing to propose a project that needs Wikipedia and I discussed about it
a little on IRC.
I wish to know that Wikimedia will not consider any Wikipedia related project
as idea’s page says or if somehow I am able to demonstrate that I will be able
to complete it in summer they can
On 2013-04-24 1:34 AM, hungers.to.nurt...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wishing to propose a project that needs Wikipedia and I discussed
about it a little on IRC.
I wish to know that Wikimedia will not consider any Wikipedia related
project as idea’s page says or if somehow I am able to
Erik Moeller wrote:
I'd like to start a broader conversation about language support in MW
core [...]
Mailing lists are good for conversation, but a lot of your e-mail was
insightful notes that I want to make sure don't get lost. I hope you'll
eventually put together an RFC
47 matches
Mail list logo
