On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Gryllida gryll...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, at 0:02, rupert THURNER wrote:
for the password policy: display a strength indicator is great. anything
more? i would say just leave it to the user.
rupert.
THANK YOU. My thoughts exactly. :-)
fde#@%62jtgjsl$#5kgsgjgseojgro@#$%SEGsgesjojahREAGHkerahj23YJ34pwyjw3$#^WrejgshSH
Time Required to Exhaustively Search this Password's Space:
Online Attack Scenario:
5.04 thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion
A three/four colour lamp + it might be forced in approx X days sounds great!
Vito
Inviato con AquaMail per Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
Il 04 febbraio 2014 10:19:12 Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Gryllida gryll...@fastmail.fm
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
fde#@%62jtgjsl$#5kgsgjgseojgro@
#$%SEGsgesjojahREAGHkerahj23YJ34pwyjw3$#^WrejgshSH
(...)
Now just remember that password.
All my passwords look like that and there is no need to remember them. You
can use a password
Hi everyone,
I recently came across a mentorship project at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mentorship_programs/Possible_projects#Provide_a_way_to_create_interactive_2D.2F3D_timelines_and_infographics_e.g._Java_applets.2C_AJAX.2C_Flash
After having discussion on this topic with some people, I want
To be honest one of things I liked most on wikipedia over other sites,
was no password policy whatsoever. I hope we never get into such a
creepy state like oracle website which requires so complicated
password that I always immediately forget it...
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Petr Bena
hacking into password manager might be easier than hacking into a human brain :P
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Željko Filipin zfili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
fde#@%62jtgjsl$#5kgsgjgseojgro@
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.dewrote:
Am 24.01.2014 14:44, schrieb Brad Jorsch (Anomie):
It looks to me like the existing patch *already is* getting too far into
the Javaification, with it's proliferation of classes with single methods
that need to be
Thanks for your input Nik!
I'll add my 2¢ below. Would be great if others could chime in.
I have just pushed a new version of the path, please have a look at
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/106517/
Am 04.02.2014 16:31, schrieb Nikolas Everett:
* Should linking, parsing, and formatting live
Google Summer of Code 2014 has started.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code_2014
(Thank you Raylton for creating this page)
The first step is to apply as Wikimedia organization before February 14.
I can do this, with your help:
* We need another org admin ready to work. I was
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest one of things I liked most on wikipedia over other sites,
was no password policy whatsoever. I hope we never get into such a
creepy state like oracle website which requires so complicated
password that I always
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest one of things I liked most on wikipedia over other sites,
was no password policy whatsoever. I hope we never get into such a
creepy
With some help from Hashar and Marktraceur I added some new CI build jobs
for some fundraising stuff -- I noticed we had a job that indicates it'll
build sphinx documentation so I figured I might as well add that and see
where I get.
... Which is not very far -- the build fails with
*19:11:58* +
I actually answered my own question mostly.
Sartoris seems to be the only project with that job enabled; and it's using
python's setuptools to run sphinx.
Given that my stuff is predominantly PHP and I was just going to use sphinx
for nice looking documentation that's not wiki based; I'm not
Today I removed the This page is currently a draft banner on
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Bugzilla_etiquette
as the comment rate on its Discussion page has been very low recently,
hence I assume consensus has been found.
The page is the outcome of lots of discussion among
On 02/04/2014 07:05 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
Today I removed the This page is currently a draft banner on
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Bugzilla_etiquette
as the comment rate on its Discussion page has been very low recently,
hence I assume consensus has been found.
The
Steven Walling wrote:
I fully agree, and this is why the RFC is very clear that the *only
immediate change proposed* is an increase in required minimum length from
one character to six. It does not suggest that we require more complex
character types, such as mixed upper/lower case, numbers,
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:20 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Ultimately, account security is a user's prerogative. [...] Banks and even
e-mail
providers have reason to implement stricter authentication requirements.
This is conflicting logic. If it is the user's job to enforce their
18 matches
Mail list logo
