On Mar 23, 2012 3:38 AM, Sam Reed re...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the availability of the second beta release of the
new MediaWiki 1.19 release series.
Please try it out and let us know what you think. Don't run it on any
wikis that you really care about, unless you are both
Surely this reply was a mistake?
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Liangent liang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2012 3:38 AM, Sam Reed re...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the availability of the second beta release of the
new MediaWiki 1.19 release series.
Please try it
On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:37:23 +0200, Jasper Deng jas...@jasperswebsite.com
wrote:
Surely this reply was a mistake?
Doesn't look like one. The important part is this:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Liangent liang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2012 3:38 AM, Sam Reed re...@wikimedia.org
On 9 May 2014 00:37, Jasper Deng jas...@jasperswebsite.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Liangent liang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2012 3:38 AM, Sam Reed re...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the availability of the second beta release of
the
new MediaWiki
On 8 May 2014 23:46, Liangent liang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2012 3:38 AM, Sam Reed re...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the availability of the second beta release of the
new MediaWiki 1.19 release series.
[Snip]
George Argyros and Aggelos Kiayias reported that the
After taking a closer look at what commands run exactly in production, it
turns out that I probably applied the IM parameters in the wrong order when
I put together the survey (order matters, particularly for sharpening).
I'll regenerate the images and make another (hopefully better) survey that
Thanks everyone who replied to the original survey! It turns out that I had
made a mistake in the way I generated some images. The results of the
survey were useful, but I was using an inferior technique to generate the
thumbnails. It would be awesome if you can answer the newer, better version
of
On Thu, 8 May 2014, at 6:22, Jared Zimmerman wrote:
Affiliations change, and user names are quite difficult to change, this
sounds like something that would be good for a structured profile, not for
a user name.
One of the times I wish I could rename a thread.
Someone with spare time may want
If I search on http://www.mediawiki.org for Search Weighting I get as result
a line:
Search (section Search Weighting Ideas) with links to the page and to the
section.
This section contains the word GeoLoc.
But if I search for GeoLoc I get just the page link.
I want to show this section link
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:32 AM, J jollylittlebottom
jollylittlebot...@hotmail.com wrote:
If I search on http://www.mediawiki.org for Search Weighting I get as
result a line:
Search (section Search Weighting Ideas) with links to the page and to
the section.
This section contains the word
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jared Zimmerman
jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Affiliations change, and user names are quite difficult to change, this
sounds like something that would be good for a structured profile, not for
a user name.
Indeed, or in the user preferences so that it
Is there any way to deliver the deprecation messages to a server side
log? I'd rather not spend time inspecting all user scripts and gadgets
manually (I'm thinking of non-WMF sites).
-Niklas
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
