Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] Mobile site is now lazy loading images

2016-08-23 Thread Pine W
Whoops, I missed the link. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Projects/Performance/Lazy_loading_images. Thanks for working on this. Pine On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Pine W wrote: > Good to hear. Does this also mean that pages load faster? > > Pine > > On Tue,

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] Mobile site is now lazy loading images

2016-08-23 Thread Pine W
Good to hear. Does this also mean that pages load faster? Pine On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jon Robson wrote: > FYI after much experimentation, research and testing the mobile site has > been lazy loading images [1] since Thursday 18th August. This means if you > do

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] Mobile site is now lazy loading images

2016-08-23 Thread Arthur Richards
This is so rad, congratulations! I know this has been years in the making - it's really awesome to see it working :D On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:11 PM Adam Baso wrote: > Good question - the code tries to fetch the images ahead of them coming > into the viewport. That can mean

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] Mobile site is now lazy loading images

2016-08-23 Thread Adam Baso
Good question - the code tries to fetch the images ahead of them coming into the viewport. That can mean upon section expansion, as well. On Tuesday, August 23, 2016, Justin Ormont wrote: > This sounds great. Are the images pre-loaded when the user gets close, or > once

Re: [Wikitech-l] [AI] Deployment of ORES review tool in Englis Wikipedia as a beta feature

2016-08-23 Thread Aaron Halfaker
Thanks Luis! :) And I just finished setting up a new labeling campaign for English Wikipedia. This data will help us train/test more accurate models. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Labels/Edit_quality for instructions on how to get started. -Aaron On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:05

Re: [Wikitech-l] [AI] Deployment of ORES review tool in Englis Wikipedia as a beta feature

2016-08-23 Thread Luis Villa
Thanks for the detailed explanation, Aaron. As always your work is a model in transparency for the rest of us :) On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:40 PM Aaron Halfaker wrote: > Hi Luis! Thanks for taking a look. > > First, I should say that false-positives should be

[Wikitech-l] MediaWiki code review stats update

2016-08-23 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
For those of you who follow http://koti.kapsi.fi/~federico/crstats/extensions.txt or other https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Development_statistics : I just recloned all the MediaWiki extensions and rerun the stats, which were no longer correct. Given that either git pull or the

Re: [Wikitech-l] [AI] Deployment of ORES review tool in Englis Wikipedia as a beta feature

2016-08-23 Thread Aaron Halfaker
Hi Luis! Thanks for taking a look. First, I should say that false-positives should be expected. We're working on better signaling in the UI so that you can differentiate the edits that ORES is confident about and those that it isn't confident about -- but are still worth your review. So, in

Re: [Wikitech-l] [AI] Deployment of ORES review tool in Englis Wikipedia as a beta feature

2016-08-23 Thread Luis Villa
Very cool! Is there any way for users of this tool to help train it? For example, the first four things it flagged in my watchlist were all false positives (next 5-6 were correctly flagged.) It'd be nice to be able to contribute to training the model somehow when we see these false-positives. On

[Wikitech-l] Deployment of ORES review tool in Englis Wikipedia as a beta feature

2016-08-23 Thread Amir Ladsgroup
We (The Revision Scoring Team ) are happy to announce the deployment of the ORES review tool as a beta feature

[Wikitech-l] 2016W34 ArchCom-RFC meeting: Schema change for page content language

2016-08-23 Thread Rob Lanphier
Hi everyone, For this week's office hour, let's discuss [T69223: schema change for page content language][1] Jaime Crespo has asked that the developers seeking this change get general consensus for the change. A discussion at an ArchCom IRC meeting isn't strictly necessary for this, it can't