On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:22 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 February 2015 at 23:19, Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com
wrote:
In fact I would prefer to go to a less restrictive license, but that is
probably not worth the fight.
And is also infeasible. For a web
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 21:25:16 Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
It's your choice to not participate in any project for any reason, but try
to understand that some people (such as myself) much prefer to work on
software that's truly free, rather than virally free.
I hope you
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, rupert THURNER
rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote:
Am 15.09.2013 17:13 schrieb Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl:
...
As you may be aware, the git-review based developer
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Max Semenik maxsem.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'd like to present a new RFC for your consideration. You can find it
at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/DataStore
Briefly, it proposes a new key-value storage for MediaWiki intended to get
rid of
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote:
Do I have to look for the MediaWiki source module/memcache API? Where ?
It's called BagOStuff.
Bryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.comwrote:
Currently our coding conventions have major prohibitions on the use of
isset() ...
Oh, would not think so if you did a grep on core.
There are valid uses for isset, and as far as I am aware, those are not
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a ridiculous conversation and I can't believe it now spans +20
messages.
Apparently you don't care, but other people do care. Please do not
disregard other people's opinions because you believe yours is correct.
To
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/**Sysadmin_hubhttp://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sysadmin_hubseems
to be the closest landing page for a sysadmin volunteer, but that
page needs love and there is little to be found there for wannabe
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com wrote:
When I used to run unit tests, there were quite regularly issues where
the unit tests assumed you had the default configuration, where they
really should not assume such a thing. (That was of course a while
ago, so things
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com
wrote:
Why not just add (more) slaves? Computing power is much
cheaper than developer time.
I absolutely agree.
I'm also in agreement on this one. Having tests run after code review
negates
the point of
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe Johannes has XCache installed and working, but it doesn't have
enough space to store the message cache, so it is always a miss, and his
threads are constantly racing to rebuild it.
Do we have a known minimum cache
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Johannes Weberhofer
jweberho...@weberhofer.at wrote:
Am 25.10.2012 18:14, schrieb OQ:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Johannes Weberhofer
jweberho...@weberhofer.at wrote:
Stripped of. You can find it here: http://www.weberhofer.at/**
mediawiki.log
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Daniel Friesen
dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
core/skins/common/upload.js
99: if ( !ajaxUploadDestCheck || !sajax_init_object() ) return;
124:if ( !ajaxUploadDestCheck || !sajax_init_object() ) return;
133:if (
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Roberto Flores f.roberto@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please provide HTML dumps (I mean, with the templates
pre-processed into HTML, everything else the same as now) every 3 or 4
months?
How a template is rendered into HTML depends very much on the context
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
I think Yury has a point. Now would be a good time to maybe discuss
exactly what's going on. As exciting a feature it may be, we cannot just
deploy next week and then have the schedule for deployment not yet
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
2) we need to look at mediawiki being used as GPL 3.0 even though it
is not explicitely licensed that way.
I'm not 100% sure what's being asked here? Is this a request to relicense
MediaWiki under GPLv3 instead
A user will have id 0, but an associated user name, when a page is
imported via Special:Import, and if said user does not exist locally.
Bryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:26 PM, CherianTinu Abraham
tinucher...@gmail.com wrote:
While having that as a global setting, can we have some pages editable by
all ( even IP users) via some settings.
A practical use for us would we , all pages under
http://wiki.wikimedia.in/WikiMeetups/
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:50 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 April 2012 12:42, Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com wrote:
This is possible, but only per namespace with $wgNamespaceProtection
[1]. So, if you move all WikiMeetups pages to the WikiMeetups:
namespace
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Trinh Hoang Nguyen trinhto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Could you please have a look at my project proposal for Google Summer of
Code
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Trinhtomsk/GSoC_2012_application
It would be awesome to have a proper Flickr upload
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Niklas Laxström
niklas.laxst...@gmail.comwrote:
Rather than solving our review problem, I think GiGeGa might even make
it worse by slowing the type development work mentioned above.
But that was the point right, to introduce this whole system? By using a
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Sam Reed re...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Full release notes:
http://svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/mediawiki/tags/REL1_18_1/phase3/RELEASE-NOT
ES
This link is broken; should be suffixed -1.18
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Well, it looks like automatic image rotation is not as good an idea as
Brion and I originally thought. Do people think we should remove the
auto-rotation (i.e. set $wgEnableAutoRotation = false) until we have
something in MediaWiki to rotate images?
Bryan
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Στις 24-11-2011, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 21:30 +0100, ο/η Daniel Zahn έγραψε:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
So, here's the solution for now, and probably for a while:
1.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Step 1: Deploy VipsScaler extension, but only use it for PNGs over
12.5MP and/or TIFFs (which currently generate errors). Let this sit
in production a while, fixing any bugs we find with this
configuration.
I should
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
5) Reading the git instructions make me feel sick
Git instructions make people feel sick, well known fact.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Ben Loblaugh (blobaugh): FileRepo refactoring, Azure support
Welcome Ben! It's great to have somebody to look over FileRepo.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Out of curiosity... If the new revisions of one of these badly edited
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Out of curiosity... If the new revisions of one of these badly edited
pages are deleted, leaving the top revision as the one just before the
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:09 PM, melvin_mm melvin...@gmx.de wrote:
Are some revisions, e.g. minor edits not included in the dump?
Deleted revisions?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
I've applied these fixes to trunk, REL1_18, and 1.18wmf1 -- phpunit test
cases have been updated, but it's still conceivable something could be wrong
so please do test. :)
Great work Brion!
Bryan
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Mark A. Hershberger
mhershber...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Mark A. Hershberger
mhershber...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thanks to all who participated in this week's triage. Next Wednesday:
Download
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
On 31/08/11 08:18, Thomas Gries wrote:
Am 31.08.2011 08:14, schrieb Nikola Smolenski:
I asked Mark already, but he hasn't answered (or at least I haven't
noticed his answer), so I guess it is appropriate to ask the
Hey,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
While spending the past few days/weeks in CodeReview, it has become
abundantly clear to me that we absolutely must get away from this idea
of doing huge refactorings in our working copies and landing them in
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Sumana Harihareswara
suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
RobLa suggested that, in most cases, the Bugzilla default assignee for a
MediaWiki component or extension should be no one (that is, the wikibugs
no one in particular user). Today Mark made that change, for
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Ian Baker iba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Temporarily stashed files now have their metadata stored in the database
instead of the session. This allows for some future feature expansion with
regard to the image review and categorization process, and works around a
Great news Rob! I'm really glad that the WMF is putting more resources
into this!
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ashar Voultoiz hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
Our javascript tests are being run under TestSwarm [1] and we currently
cover up most desktop browsers (thanks brion).
Firefox 5 is missing.
Bryan
___
Wikitech-l
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:02 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Are we talking about WMF deployments or tarballs here? Speaking as a
tarball user, 2 releases a year, maybe 3, is *just fine*.
I think 3 releases
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How long does it take for the commons thumbnails to update after a new
version has been loaded?
Immediately. If they do not, they are likely to be affected by
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28613
Can we have a proper domain name for cruisecontrol? Something like
testing.mediawiki.org. That is much easier to remember than
ci.usability.tesla.wikimedia.org or whatever.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hello,
How do I pass parameters dynamically to an RL module? I need to pass a
FileRepo object to the RL module when I call $wgOut-addModuleStyle().
Bryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Max Semenik maxsem.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17.06.2011, 1:08 Bryan wrote:
Can somebody on Windows/SQLite try running the tests? I'm consistently
getting two failures in XmlTest, which Chad apparently is not getting:
Yes, same thing for me. Hoowever. the difs
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Painstakingly, all of the unit tests are now passing on cruise control
(Sqlite)
and my local install (Sqlite Mysql). This is as of r90150 [0]. Thank you
immensely to Brion for finally tracking down and eliminating that
Can somebody on Windows/SQLite try running the tests? I'm consistently
getting two failures in XmlTest, which Chad apparently is not getting:
1) XmlSelectTest::testSetDefault
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
selectoption value=foo1foo1/option
option
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Purpose:
To avoid duplication of content, especially for documentation of extensions,
I wish to transclude a README file from our SVN on a Mediawiki extension
page or subpage such as
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:00 AM, reporter repor...@kaulen.wikimedia.org wrote:
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for May 09, 2011 - May 16, 2011
A productive weekend!
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Tod listac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to make a call to a service on another server and present the
results in a mediawiki page. Does the current release of MW (1.16.5 I
think) have a built in proxy to support this ?
No. Writing one should be trivial, but
Can we stop discussing this issue? I believe that most MediaWiki
developers are in fact not interested in changing the status quo with
regards to licensing, so there is no point in discussing it.
Bryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
MediaWiki assumes an SQL database backend, and breaking that
assumption would require rewriting MediaWiki. However, certain things
are abstracted and can be stored in different ways. Uploaded files
are one
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
currently there's no exposed
license metadata (highly desired for Wikimedia's usage, obviously)
Krinkle and me have been working on that a while ago, but after
discussion on this list it appeared that we were following a
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
* Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com [Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:07:09 -0400]:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
Also, it's
interesting why an ancestor of DatabaseBase is not a member of
Hi all,
I'm wondering what the status for 1.17 is. How far are we from RC? Is
there any more review left?
Related to this, as our review burden for 1.17 lessens, we should
start to think about 1.18: re-recruit reviewers again, start thinking
about when to branch 1.18, etc. Are there any plans
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
* http://ta.wikipedia.org/?curid=2810 (already works)
* http://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ShortUrl/262 (proposal; //
base_convert ( 2810, 10, 36 ); )
I think permalink is the common used term for this kind of url. So
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Bryan Tong Minh
bryan.tongm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
* http://ta.wikipedia.org/?curid=2810 (already works)
* http://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ShortUrl/262 (proposal; //
base_convert ( 2810, 10
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 12 apr 2011, om 21:35 heeft Bryan Tong Minh het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Bryan Tong Minh
bryan.tongm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com
wrote
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Friesen
li...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
Personally, I like tacking on ?action=edit and especially purge.
Prefixing Special:Edit/ doesn't sound nice to me.
I know I fixed the issues with things like Special:Movepage not sharing
the same UI tabs as the
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Mark A. Hershberger
mhershber...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Following the weekend sprint, a little blocker pruning, and consulting
with Robla and Chad, I'm pleased to announce that Chad will be pushing
the first 1.17 Release Candidate by this Friday.
Great work,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:39 PM, SALIL P A salilpa...@gmail.com wrote:
to make the api sandbox really useful, it ideally should have automatic php
code generation too ( i don't know if it is overambitious ). for example for
login and logout, user can just give his userid and password and the
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel Friesen wrote:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/80248
Comment gives a Tesla link saying something broke. However the Tesla
link does not identify that commit as the guaranteed commit that
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think moving to git will make code review very much easier in
the short term. It would probably disrupt code review considerably,
in fact, because people would have to get used to the new system. So
I
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Happy-melon happy-me...@live.com wrote:
*We* write MediaWiki, and we could in principle do
it in notepad or pico if we wanted (some of us probably do :-D).
I don't think anybody writes in notepad, as notepad inserts UTF byte
order marks at the beginning of a
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Joseph Roberts
roberts.jos...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've been scanning the source and I can't find where the players are kept.
Can anyone add any insight on this? Is it done as a hook or direct code?
Extension:OggHandler. The video player is Cortado,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 23/03/11 12:05, Rob Lanphier wrote:
If our code review system was working smoothly, I wouldn't mind
delaying this. However, it's pretty clear that code reviews aren't
keeping pace (be sure to look at revisions
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Thomas Bleher thomasble...@gmx.de wrote:
(Small wish: it would be very helpful if every commit message referencing a
bug would also include the one-line summary of the bug; that makes it much
easier to quickly determine what the bug is about and if a bug is
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Diederik van Liere dvanli...@gmail.com wrote:
So maybe we can paste these 5 steps (or something similar) in the initial
form used to file a bugreport.
This would increase the quality of bugreports and make it easier for bug
triaging.
Increase the quality
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
To start out with catching up on patch review, I took a look over and
applied the patches on bug 23817, fixing wfObjectToArray() and FormatJson
for a case that broke certain parts of ForeignAPIRepo when PHP's native JSON
Hi Mark,
It is good to see people thinking about 1.18 already!
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Mark A. Hershberger
mhershber...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The problem with our current VCS is the sort of work-flow that has
developed around it.
But we can solve the work-flow problem without
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Leo diebu...@gmail.com wrote:
*Quote: Respond to contributions immediately.
This is what I think bugs me the most. There are heaps of bugs which have had
patches attached for month or years. For newcomers, who maybe spent a lot of
time on these, it's just
Hi,
There have been a lot of mails since I last had the the time to reply,
so I'll reply to some points in a single mail.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
An internally handled parser function doesn't conflict with showing it
as a textbox.
We could for
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Jan Paul Posma jp.po...@gmail.com wrote:
That's precisely the kind of things you want to find out from a
usability study. That's why I reported it, not only to show the world
how dumb I am :)
My eyes moved from Awesome, you are editing Wikipedia! to Can you
]]}} means nothing to
MediaWiki or re-users, but Author: Bryan___ [checkbox] This is a
Commons username can be parsed by MediaWiki to mean something. It
also allows us to mass change for example the author. If I want to
change my attribution from Bryan to Bryan Tong Minh, I would need
to edit
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 21/01/11 12:46, Trevor Parscal wrote:
Joke or not, it's in there, and it's a violation of the GPL.
Did you try emailing the author and asking for a dual license?
I believe that people from Redhat have already
Hello,
As you may have noticed, Roan, Krinkle and me have started to more
tightly integrate image licensing within MediaWiki. Our aim is to
create a system where it should be easy to obtain the basic copyright
information of an image in a machine readable format, as well as
querying images with
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
(here I am again, throwing tech solutions at social problems...)
The non-technical solution would be for wikitech-l/#wikimedia-tech
regulars to start poking people at IRC when error reports come in on
the
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de wrote:
* There will be a hackathon hosted by Wikimedia Germany in (late) May,
probably
in Berlin, but that's not decided yet. This will mostly about hacking, with a
strong focus on GLAM related stuff. There will be little in
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
its just a matter of matching page titles, if there is a page in namespace 0
and a page in namespace (article and article talk) with the same title they
go together. its fairly simple
To expand John's comment, the talk page
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/7 Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org:
I disabled
LabeledSectionTransclusion because of an error in
LabeledSectionTransclusion::setup
Stupid mistake on my part, Sam fixed it in r79810. I merged it to
1.17,
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/7 Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com:
Also FR seems to be unconditionally enabled, also on wikis that do not
have the tables present.
Which wikis would those be? Rob says he ran update.php so all
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
What tools are there to count the number of categories,
sort them by the number of members (subcategories and
articles), and to determine which branches of the
category tree should be pruned?
With the new category table in
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Question: assuming that our primary interest is creating software for
Wikipedia and similar WMF projects, do we actually get anything from the
Windows PC intranet users that offsets the cost of keeping MediaWiki
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Maciej Jaros e...@wp.pl wrote:
If one would have a budget of gazillions of dollars then it would be
quite easy ;-). The problem is - what would be the point of investing
such money if you wouldn't get it back from this investment?
While money can fix a lot of
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Soxred93 soxre...@gmail.com wrote:
The usage is simple:
sfFinder::type('file')-name('*.php')-in('/path/to/dir'); //list of PHP
files in directory and all subdirectories
sfFinder::type('file')-name('*.php')-in('/path/to/dir')-recurse(0); //list
of PHP files
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
The optimal way to use a framework is to integrate it through the whole
code base. For example, special pages, actions may use Symphony routing.
I do agree that GlobalFunctions are somewhat outdated (although the
calls
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We certainly want people to host it as well. It's not a matter of
bandwidth but of protection: if someone can't get to our copy for
whatever reason, another copy is accessible.
Is there a copy in Amsterdam? Seems
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
This appears to go wrong only on wikis rewriting urls.
You are rewriting into the root of the domain. This is guaranteed to
go wrong and therefore an unsupported rewrite mode for MediaWiki.
Bryan
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
When you commit or find a revision post-r77974 that you feel should be
in 1.17 (bugfixes, typically, no new features), tag it with 1.17 in
CodeReview.
Also note that if you MFT a 1.18 revision to 1.16wmf4, you should
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel Friesen wrote:
PHP - XSL doesn't quite feel like much of an improvement in terms of
cutting down on the verbose redundant code boilerplate required to
insert something.
ie: xsl:value-of select=title/ doesn't look
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Oh please no!
- Trevor
On 12/7/10 7:26 AM, Platonides wrote:
Daniel Friesen wrote:
PHP - XSL doesn't quite feel like much of an improvement in terms of
cutting down on the verbose redundant code boilerplate
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/12/4 Robert Leverington rob...@rhl.me.uk:
It is unclear to me whether the plan is to branch from the latest
reviewed code or trunk HEAD
This was kind of overlooked by everyone in that discussion :(
The latest
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
So probably the core patch is
the only efficient way to solve my problem?
You can always supply a database patch with your extension to add
indices you need to core tables.
Bryan
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
An alternative [to rejecting all ZIP files] would be to parse the
entire zip directory and to reject any archives that contain a file
with a .class extension. I can’t vouch for this method. **If you did
this, the zip
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, as discussed with Ariel, I will gladly mirror such dumps at wm-es
web space.
You do have a toolserver account right? I think it would be a good
idea if you could copy the dumps from the TS to your web space.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Crossposting.
This dump is in /mnt/user-store/dump or dumps, on Toolserver. If the admins
don't see any problem, it may be put available for download (~30GB).
Somehow I think that publishing an entire dump violates the do not
about
it from a very quick Google search:
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/curlphp-2004-01/0043.html
Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail)
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Bryan Tong Minh
bryan.tongm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Anand Ramanathan rcan...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, I
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
[Kicking this thread back to life, full-quoting below only for quick
reference.]
I've collected some additional notes on this here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Restricted_uploads
Would appreciate
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
The idea of a dontcare status is demotivating and it is not at all in line
with best practice.
Ideally, we would indeed review every commit to our SVN. Ideally
however, we would be able to review commits to core in
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
Although the developers are smart people so probably I am wasting the
time and there is no reason to make incremental backups?
The main reason I believe is that it takes somebody to write such code.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I don't have anything useful to say, but I wanted to add state +1
Bryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
In ideal
world, there probably should be no direct access to $_FILES[] and usage
of is_uploaded_file(), but all of these calls should be encapsulated
into WebRequest class, imo.
As off r70037 and follow-ups, this has
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
