Has anyone looked into introducing .wiki, initially for Wikimedia, but
later for others (the fee could support the foundation)?
On Saturday, June 18, 2011, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose in theory having apple available is no worse than apple.com
(since you *could* have an
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Mono mium monom...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone looked into introducing .wiki, initially for Wikimedia, but
later for others (the fee could support the foundation)?
Got $US 185,000 handy to cover the application fee?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Bain stephen.b...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Mono mium monom...@gmail.com
wrote:
Has anyone looked into introducing .wiki, initially for Wikimedia,
but later for others (the fee could support the foundation)?
Got $US 185,000
I suppose in theory having apple available is no worse than apple.com
(since you *could* have an apple.com.mylocaldomain already and have to
worry about which takes precedence), but in practice that sounds like a
crappy thing to do. :)
Well, yes, this is exactly why you don't usually use TLDs
While the topic of how Mediawiki handles URLs is on the table, let me point
out today's Slashdot piece, which notes that ICANN is about to open up the
gTLD namespace...
*to everyone*, not just commercial registries.
Contemplate, if you will:
http://apple/
How will MW handle a FQDN with no
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
While the topic of how Mediawiki handles URLs is on the table, let me
point
out today's Slashdot piece, which notes that ICANN is about to open up the
gTLD namespace...
*to everyone*, not just commercial registries.
- Original Message -
From: Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
While the topic of how Mediawiki handles URLs is on the table, let
me point out today's Slashdot piece, which notes that ICANN is about to open
up the gTLD
