Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an extra tab for a specific type of article that shows some additional
information about this article. This view is per article. It does
Can it not in some way be included in action=info ?
DJ
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
Hey,
Can it not in some way be included in action=info ?
In this case: no. That is however sidestepping my question :)
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On 23.04.2013 14:46, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an extra tab for a specific type of article that shows some additional
information about
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an extra tab for a specific type of article that shows
Here's my take on it:
From the design perspective, SpecialPages are superior. It's one of the
most mature controlling units in MediaWiki, primarily because current
special pages do so many complex things there has developed a need for
abstraction that handles many use cases. Actions, on the other
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 05:46:31 -0700, Jeroen De Dauw
jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to ask
if I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case.
So is one approach preferred?
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 06:07:15 -0700, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de
wrote:
On 23.04.2013 14:46, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
At the risk of starting an emacs vs vim like discussion, I'd like to
ask if
I ought to be using a SpecialPage or an Action in my use case. I want to
have an
On 04/23/2013 09:58 AM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
Mind pointing out what is messy about special pages? If you've got an
actual issue with them some of us would probably like to actually fix it.
Cause actions were in fact the older interface. Till one or two people
attempted to bring them up to
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:07:20 -0700, Matthew Flaschen
mflasc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 04/23/2013 09:58 AM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
Mind pointing out what is messy about special pages? If you've got an
actual issue with them some of us would probably like to actually fix
it.
Cause actions
Hey,
Perhaps I have some misconceptions here, but was the Action class not
recently (~1.18) introduced, and is it not required to use actions to
specify behaviours for alternate content models?
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:02:56 -0700, Jeroen De Dauw
jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Perhaps I have some misconceptions here, but was the Action class not
recently (~1.18) introduced, and is it not required to use actions to
specify behaviours for alternate content models?
Cheers
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
