This might be a good discussion for the dev summit?
I talked to Moriel about this a couple of days ago. I too am a bit
concerned and feel like this needs a dedicated team, preferably
without a product to manage and mediate/prioritise requests against it
as otherwise the library will be biased
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Jon Robson wrote:
> [OOjs UI ownership] might be a good discussion for the dev summit?
Perhaps. I'd say the idea in Phab. It's obviously way past the
scheduled date for submissions[1], but the schedule isn't etched in
stone, and it might
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński
wrote:
> On 2015-12-04 18:59, Adam Baso wrote:
>
>> I do wonder though if we've spent much time studying the ease of getting
>> at
>> least some part of oojs-ui split out or making it so that new stuff going
>> forward is
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Unfortunately since the mid-2015 Engineering department reorgs, there is no
> such team...
>
I agree, such a team should be created. I'll be first in line to sign up,
and as part of such a team I'd be happy to help
Short-cut answer to the title question: Me.
On 9 December 2015 at 10:26, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński
> wrote:
>
> > On 2015-12-04 18:59, Adam Baso wrote:
> >
> >> I do wonder though if we've spent
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:40 PM, James Forrester
wrote:
> Short-cut answer to the title question: Me.
>
I'm glad to hear that you are accepting responsibility for OOjs UI
development! Do you have a timeline on a fix for T113681, or a page that
indicates what
OOjs UI is used as a core component of MediaWiki's user interfaces,
including heavy use in WMF-sponsored initiatives such as VE and Flow and
slowly increasing use within core; as such it should probably be maintained
by the MediaWiki Core team at Wikimedia Foundation.
Unfortunately since the