On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
So when did we get this new repo browser? Looks pretty nice, but I should
note that all on-wiki gitweb links have now been broken.
I updated mediawiki.org's {{git file}} and {{git summary}}. I left
templates like
I agree it would be nice for our repos (or git-review setup steps) would have
sane defaults instead of ones almost everyone will want to change to not be
annoyed.
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Aaron Schulz aschulz4...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree it would be nice for our repos (or git-review setup steps) would
have
sane defaults instead of ones almost everyone will want to change to not be
annoyed.
Setting defaultremote=origin in each repository's
Le 06/06/13 00:45, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
I wonder if origin should be made the default setting for gerrit - after
all every new git clone automatically uses origin. The fewer surprise!
moments devs have, the more productive we become.
This is how I name my git remotes:
For Gerrit based
Le 06/06/13 00:15, Andre Klapper a écrit :
in December I mentioned the idea of having a PATCH_AVAILABLE or
PATCH_TO_REVIEW status in Bugzilla [1] and that we should re-evaluate
the idea once we have automatic notifications from Gerrit into Bugzilla
in place [2]. This is now the case [3].
snip
Le 06/06/13 06:49, Tyler Romeo a écrit :
So when did we get this new repo browser? Looks pretty nice, but I should
note that all on-wiki gitweb links have now been broken.
For those wondering, Gitblit is a web frontend to git repositories. Chad
has setup an instance at:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:15:47AM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Hence I propose
* [ drop patch-in-gerrit keyword ]
* [ Add PATCH_AVAILABLE/PATCH_TO_REVIEW status ]
I'd love to see that happening. :-)
Best regards,
Christian
--
quelltextlich e.U. \\ Christian
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
The debug console seems finicky. Its line numbers never seem to make
sense. For example, I input this into a fresh console:
The console isn't designed to handle blocks of code. You should compose
blocks of code into the
Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
in December I mentioned the idea of having a PATCH_AVAILABLE or
PATCH_TO_REVIEW status in Bugzilla [1] and that we should re-evaluate
the idea once we have automatic notifications from Gerrit into Bugzilla
in place [2]. This is now the case [3].
snip
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Peter Coombe thewub.w...@googlemail.comwrote:
What is the rationale for moving ULS from the personal toolbar to the
interlanguage links on some sites? I find this change odd:
* makes location and appearance of ULS inconsistent between sites
* personal toolbar
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
The debug console seems finicky. Its line numbers never seem to make
sense.
The debug console probably could use some work. The way it works now,
it takes your past and current input, plugs all that into some
boilerplate to
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 21:54 -0400, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
On 06/05/2013 08:18 PM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
What is the workflow when:
# Someone mentions the bug in a commit.
# Gerrit Notification Bot changes the report status to PATHCH_TO_REVIEW
# The patch is only related or only a partial
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:29 -0700, Jon Robson wrote:
I've been using ASSIGNED and assignee name to mean this... to me if
someone is assigned to something it is a promise to attempt to fix it.
Ideally I'd use ASSIGNED when seriously(TM) planning to work on a patch.
I mean, seriously. But I know
Salut,
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 11:25 +0200, Antoine Musso wrote:
Launchpad.net has instead of RESOLVED and VERIFIED:
Fix Committed (fixed but not available until next release)
Fix Released (fix released).
---8---8---8---8---8---8---
Which is essentially the
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 10:47 +1000, K. Peachey wrote:
How does a Status change work better than a Keyword change in this case?
It does not (assuming that the hooks-bugzilla plugin can do both status
and keyword changes), I'm just combining two aspects in one go. :)
A keyword (that I consider
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This is a bit annoying, because at first glance invoke looks like it's
just an alternate syntax for a Lua function invocation, so you expect
{{#invoke:Sort|asc|3|1|2}} to be equivalent to sort.asc(3, 1, 2), but
that's not the
On 6 June 2013 15:40, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Salut,
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 11:25 +0200, Antoine Musso wrote:
Launchpad.net has instead of RESOLVED and VERIFIED:
Fix Committed (fixed but not available until next release)
Fix Released (fix released).
Event Details
# Date: 2013-06-12
# Time: 1700-1800 UTC, 1000-1100 PDT
#IRC channel: #wikimedia-office on irc.freenode.net
The Wikimedia Language Engineering team [1] invites everyone to join the
team’s monthly office hour on June 12, 2013 (Wednesday) at 1700 UTC/1000
PDT in #wikimedia-office.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:05 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
* In gerrit but not merged - PATCH IN REVIEW (eww) or COMMITTED or
whatever.
Committed would've been appropriate in Subversion, but 'committed' in Git
does not guarantee it is available in Gerrit.
On Thu, Jun 6,
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:39:41PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
assuming that the hooks-bugzilla plugin can do both status
and keyword changes
That assumption does not hold true:
hooks-bugzilla can set the status, but it currently cannot set
keywords, as j2bugzilla (underlying java-bugzilla
Hello all,
I’m delighted to announce that Ken Snider is joining the Wikimedia
operations team. He will start as an international contractor working
remotely from Toronto, Canada on June 10, and will be visiting SF in
the week of June 17. We’re currently in the process of seeking work
On 6 June 2013 16:58, Christian Aistleitner christ...@quelltextlich.atwrote:
However, adding that functionality is totally doable, if we settle for
staying with keywords. (Which I hope we do not)
I agree; keywords are meant to be time-invariant, not statuses; they're the
wrong conceptual item
quote name=Erik Moeller date=2013-06-06 time=09:17:29 -0700
Hello all,
I’m delighted to announce that Ken Snider is joining the Wikimedia
operations team.
Welcome Ken! Can't wait to start working with you!
Greg
--
| Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E |
| identi.ca:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The debug console probably could use some work. The way it works now,
it takes your past and current input, plugs all that into some
boilerplate to make a function, and then executes that function. The
line numbers
On 06/06/13 07:21, Daniel Friesen wrote:
Side topic, anyone want to voice their bikeshed opinions on their
favorite the different ways of disambiguating a / inside urls for
various types of web UIs to repositories:
- Rejecting slash in repository names /.../mediawiki-core/... (ie:
GitHub :/)
-
On 06/06/13 18:17, Erik Moeller wrote:
I want to again take this opportunity to thank CT Woo for his tireless
operations leadership since December 2010. I’d also like to thank
everyone who’s participated in the Director of TechOps search process.
Since Dec 2010. Time flies!
Welcome Ken!
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
snip
Is there a better way to write/debug Lua modules? Any help writing these
modules (or simply getting a working sort module on Meta-Wiki) would be
appreciated.
I edited your code to make the Sort Module do what I think you
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Quick two questions:
1) Was that bug with E:CentralAuth that prevented us from turning on
$wgSecureLogin ever fixed? If so, can we attempt another deployment?
2) I noticed something in the signpost:
Walsh told the
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
You are misreading. What is being discussed is HTTPS by default for
anonymous readers.
Ah yes. I see now.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com |
On 06/06/2013 11:16 AM, Alex Monk wrote:
This should definitely not be used for WMF cluster deployment, only for
tarball releases to third parties (if at all).
Also I'm not sure 'Verified' is completely unused...
I don't generally use it, but I've seen the QA/browser testing team do so.
Matt
30 matches
Mail list logo
