I strongly agree with what both of you have suggested; I particularly
think Francois is correct to suggest that we resolve some of the
hierarchy/name space issues with keywords.
I have one problem with keywords is that I do not trust anyone to enter
'correct' informations :-) IMHO, the more
I expand here on the ideas developped by Jeremy in his mail to the
wine-devel mailing list [1] to create a new improved Wine application
database (I had a bit of time on my hands during these vacations
without a Linux PC but with a text editor :-) ).
I) Goals
=
The ultimate goals of
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:13:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if you add games, the situation is different again. Should we have :
LucasArts
Monkey Island
1
2
3
4
Or :
LucasArts
Monkey Island 1
Monkey Island 2
While I understand the
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Bret Mogilefsky wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:13:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if you add games, the situation is different again. Should we have :
[...]
Similar titles do not mean they are
anything like each other inside.
I agree with you on this
This email is full of good ideas but I would like to first put the
emphasis on what I believe are the most important features to get an
application database that actually works, i.e. contains up-to-date,
useful and relevant information:
* allow multiple user comments for each application
Hi,
One thing that needs to be mentioned is if an app runs without a real windows
installation. IMO there should be 2 ratings; with and without an offical
O/S installed.
This is important because the difference between the two gives us a clearer
picture of how much work is outstanding on
Wow! Just when you think a thread had gone into the black hole...g
I strongly agree with what both of you have suggested; I particularly
think Francois is correct to suggest that we resolve some of the
hierarchy/name space issues with keywords.
Also, I think it's vital that in addition to a
