David Elliott writes:
Jeff Tranter wrote:
Yes, CorelDRAW and PHOTO-PAINT are now released. It's
not our only task, but we will be working on a merge
of our code with WineHQ. We're starting to plan it
now and expect to start in a week or two (a lot of
people are on vacation right
On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, Francois Gouget wrote:
[snip] Lots of stuff about files sizes.
Even if the binaries are provided on a web/ftp site someone will
have to download them and 2MB seems like a lot. For one Dll and an
executable I would expect something like 30-50KB at most. How come
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Wilbur N. Dale wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, Christopher Morgan wrote:
How big would the binaries for the programs be? I heard some mention of
2MB binaries, which is an expected size for a windows application,
nothing out of the ordinary these days, but would that be
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, admiral coeyman wrote:
[snip]
My hand is up. My compilers are all legitimate. I got three coppies of
Microsoft Visual C++ from Ollies, a local surplus retailer.
I concurr, though. The source code makes a much better example than the
binary.
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, Christopher Morgan wrote:
How big would the binaries for the programs be? I heard some mention of
2MB binaries, which is an expected size for a windows application,
nothing out of the ordinary these days, but would that be 10-15 2MB
files? Adding 10MB to the cvs tree
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Wilbur N. Dale wrote:
As I have posted previously, I will remove the binary parts and resubmit the
patch. However, I think a solution needs to be found for readers who do not
have access to a windows compiler.
There are several free compilers available for compiling
Hello again,
I *really* appreciate your involvement into Winelib things;
Winelib is crucial for getting new and, more importantly, experienced
Windows developers.
BUT:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Wilbur N. Dale wrote:
As you can see, the dll is critical to the example. I do
Patrik Stridvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
You know there are people (like me) that programs Win32 (MFC) for
a living, that uses a company paid Microsoft Visual C++.
If I started working for another company that didn't use
Microsoft Visual C++ and perhaps even didn't use Windows
I wouldn't
Patrik Stridvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
You know there are people (like me) that programs Win32 (MFC) for
a living, that uses a company paid Microsoft Visual C++.
If I started working for another company that didn't use
Microsoft Visual C++ and perhaps even didn't use Windows
I wouldn't
What you said was:
"Errmm... if you know the API you probably used it for quite a while,
so you probably had a compiler once, which you (being
typically dishonest)
warezed, so you can compile the examples for err... home use... or
something."
What I said was:
1. I _have_ learned Win32
Patrik Stridvall wrote:
The most important point IMHO is merging with Corel's tree.
Since IIRC Corel Draw for Linux has been released, I should
guess that it will take that long before it will happends.
Anybody from Corel care to comment on it?
Yes, CorelDRAW and PHOTO-PAINT are now
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Juergen Schmied wrote:
The patch contains example programs including a windows dll and a windows exe.
The net result is the tar file is about 2 meg. Is there a limit set someplace
on the size of an email sent to wine-patches?
Hmm, the cvs tree is text-only. Why do you
Wilbur N. Dale writes:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Juergen Schmied wrote:
The patch contains example programs including a windows dll and a windows exe.
The net result is the tar file is about 2 meg. Is there a limit set someplace
on the size of an email sent to wine-patches?
Hmm, the cvs
Forgive me for intruding (I'm not a wine developer) but I thought winelib was
mainly for porting from Win32 - Unix.
Why would someone porting from Win32 *not* have access to Visual Studio?
-Simon.
Forgive me for intruding (I'm not a wine developer) but I thought winelib was
mainly for porting from Win32 - Unix.
Why would someone porting from Win32 *not* have access to Visual Studio?
Just because of using Borland C
I think it would be good to have such files on a ftp directory on
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:18:35PM +0200, Juergen Schmied wrote:
Forgive me for intruding (I'm not a wine developer) but I thought winelib was
mainly for porting from Win32 - Unix.
Why would someone porting from Win32 *not* have access to Visual Studio?
Just because of using Borland
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, Simon Harrison wrote:
Forgive me for intruding (I'm not a wine developer) but I thought winelib was
mainly for porting from Win32 - Unix.
Why would someone porting from Win32 *not* have access to Visual Studio?
-Simon.
WineLib allows you to use the win32 API under
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, Simon Harrison wrote:
Forgive me for intruding (I'm not a wine developer) but I thought winelib was
mainly for porting from Win32 - Unix.
Why would someone porting from Win32 *not* have access to Visual Studio?
-Simon.
WineLib allows you to use the win32 API under
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, Simon Harrison wrote:
Forgive me for intruding (I'm not a wine developer) but I
thought winelib was
mainly for porting from Win32 - Unix.
Why would someone porting from Win32 *not* have access to
Visual Studio?
-Simon.
WineLib allows you to use the win32 API
How big would the binaries for the programs be? I heard some mention of
2MB binaries, which is an expected size for a windows application,
nothing out of the ordinary these days, but would that be 10-15 2MB
files? Adding 10MB to the cvs tree probably wouldn't be all that bad
considering the
Simon Harrison,
Errmm... if you know the API you probably used it for quite a while, so you probably
had a compiler once, which you (being typically dishonest) warezed, so you can
compile the
examples for err... home use... or something. Hands up people who don't know
someone with
Visual
21 matches
Mail list logo
