At 02.02 17/12/2002 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On December 16, 2002 02:37 pm, Alberto Massari wrote:
+void WINAPI SwitchToFiber(LPVOID lpFiber)
+{
+#ifdef HAVE_UCONTEXT_H
+PHFIBER pFiber,pCurrentFiber;
+pFiber=(PHFIBER)lpFiber;
+
On December 17, 2002 04:59 am, Alberto Massari wrote:
It's just a matter of deciding what is best from a maintenance point of
view: grouping the working code or grouping the functions.
I would say grouping the working code is preferable (second patch you sent)
as the ugliness does not interfere
Alberto Massari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's just a matter of deciding what is best from a maintenance point
of view: grouping the working code or grouping the functions.
There are valid arguments in favour of both styles, and I have no
strong feelings, so I will submit the new patch
On December 16, 2002 02:37 pm, Alberto Massari wrote:
+void WINAPI SwitchToFiber(LPVOID lpFiber)
+{
+#ifdef HAVE_UCONTEXT_H
+PHFIBER pFiber,pCurrentFiber;
+pFiber=(PHFIBER)lpFiber;
+pCurrentFiber=(PHFIBER)TlsGetValue(fiber_tls_index);
+TRACE(Switching from %p to
