Re: Visual-MinGW: Winelib patch

2003-01-02 Thread Manu
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On December 31, 2002 03:43 pm, Manu wrote: that Visual-MinGW should not depend on cygwin, no? If so, it makes sense to make this explicit with -mno-cygwin. If MinGW doesn't complain, I agree. It shouldn't, it's documented to do so, try it out. It works

Re: Visual-MinGW: Winelib patch

2003-01-02 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On January 2, 2003 09:33 am, Manu wrote: Makefiles are standard Visual-MinGW generated makefiles, meanwhile configure.in, Makefile.am are available, I suggest cvs add Makefile.wine. I don't understand what you mean. I wasn't suggesting anything non-standard. As for cvs add Makefile.wine, it's

Re: Visual-MinGW: Winelib patch

2003-01-01 Thread Manu
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On December 31, 2002 01:52 pm, Manu wrote: -mno-cygwin don't have much sense, since Visual-MinGW is built with MinGW, under Windows, not Cygwin. Yes, I know, but -mno-cygwin should be a noop in that case. And if someone has cygwin installed, it will ensure

Visual-MinGW: Winelib patch

2002-12-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Hi Manu, I got around getting Visual-MinGW to compile under Winelib. This patch touches only your makefile, and I hope the changes are not controversial: -- Use forward slash instead of backslash -- Explicitly list the DLLs you link against (shell32, comdlg32, advapi32) -- It make sense

Re: Visual-MinGW: Winelib patch

2002-12-31 Thread Manu
Dimitrie O. Paun: Hi Manu, I got around getting Visual-MinGW to compile under Winelib. This patch touches only your makefile, and I hope the changes are not controversial: -- Use forward slash instead of backslash Yes, logical. -- Explicitly list the DLLs you link against (shell32

Re: Visual-MinGW: Winelib patch

2002-12-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 31, 2002 01:52 pm, Manu wrote: -mno-cygwin don't have much sense, since Visual-MinGW is built with MinGW, under Windows, not Cygwin. Yes, I know, but -mno-cygwin should be a noop in that case. And if someone has cygwin installed, it will ensure that Visual-MinGW is not linked

Re: Visual-MinGW: Winelib patch

2002-12-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 31, 2002 03:43 pm, Manu wrote: that Visual-MinGW should not depend on cygwin, no? If so, it makes sense to make this explicit with -mno-cygwin. If MinGW doesn't complain, I agree. It shouldn't, it's documented to do so, try it out. -fvtable-thunks is problematic. I use gcc

Re: Visual-MinGW

2002-11-20 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Folks, After a bit of hacking, I've got the Visual-MinGW project to compile, and link just fine. Problem is that it does not run. Dies right away with a segmentation fault, so I think I've messed something up with the building part. did

Re: Visual-MinGW

2002-11-20 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 20, 2002 03:55 am, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: did you give a try with winedbg ? winedbg doesn't start. a +debugmsg +relay doesn't give anything, I think the seg fault happens during the loading. Check out the strace output... -- Dimi.

Re: Visual-MinGW

2002-11-20 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 20, 2002 05:58 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: Or maybe the startup script? No, it's not the startup script. If I just replace the appdir with notepad's, everything works fine. So the script is just fine. It's the building people... Can it be because it's a C++ app? -- Dimi.

Re: Visual-MinGW

2002-11-20 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 20, 2002 02:01 pm, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: if winedbg doesn't even start, we can say without risk of error that you have a problem in your wine tree. it's 'make distclean' time. No, my tree is perfect, everything works OK. The problem is with _this_ app only, I'm doing something

Re: Visual-MinGW

2002-11-20 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : On November 20, 2002 02:01 pm, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: if winedbg doesn't even start, we can say without risk of error that you have a problem in your wine tree. it's 'make distclean' time. No, my tree is perfect, everything works OK.

Re: Visual-MinGW

2002-11-20 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 20, 2002 08:33 pm, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: I don't understand you here. you said winedbg doesnt start. Sorry, I wasn't clear. If I do: [dimi@dimi src]$ /home/dimi/dev/wine/wine/programs/winedbg/winedbg It comes up just fine. But if I do: [dimi@dimi src]$

Re: Visual-MinGW

2002-11-20 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 20, 2002 06:05 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: It's the building, people... Can it be because it's a C++ app? Yes, it's the C++ thingy that screws it up. I've compiled putty just the same, and it works perfectly. Now, this is a very simple application, really, why would it die like this?

Visual-MinGW

2002-11-19 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Folks, After a bit of hacking, I've got the Visual-MinGW project to compile, and link just fine. Problem is that it does not run. Dies right away with a segmentation fault, so I think I've messed something up with the building part. So, to help you help me, I've included the following

Visual-MingW

2002-11-16 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Just a quick heads up. I've been working on compiling Visual-MingW as a Winelib app. Hence the header patches I've sent :) I got it to compile (including resources), but it does not link. Shouldn't be too hard to do, I'll post what changes I had to do later on. -- Dimi.