Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Compiling stuff with visual studio is a first step. But it should be
very simple to do a Makefile for the examples, how many files do you
have in one example?
Here is an example Makefile that you can use under mingw:
(let me know if it doesn't work, I just typed it inline
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Compiling under the SDK using MS tools gives us little value. We already
know that works. If you don't want to spend the cash on MSVC (and not make
MS any richer :)), and are willing to invest some time into it, I suggest
the following path:
1. Get the latest mingw 2.0
Glen Kaukola wrote:
Well I've gotten MinGW and sorta learned my way around it. But now, my
problem is that neither of my windows programming books has makefiles of
any sort. All they have is C++ code. So maybe I should go with my
original plan of compiling stuff with visual studio and seeing
On January 10, 2003 01:14 am, Glen Kaukola wrote:
All they have is C++ code. So maybe I should go with my
original plan of compiling stuff with visual studio and seeing if it
runs under wine. Or do you have any other suggestions?
Compiling stuff with visual studio is a first step. But it
Hi everyone,
I forget who's advice it was I took, but I went out and bought a few
books on windows programming. And I plan to get started trying to help
out with the wine project by trying to get the sample applications from
the books to run under wine. If nothing else I guess I can let
On January 7, 2003 03:03 am, Glen Kaukola wrote:
So what I'm wondering now is what I should be using to compile my
applications on windows. One of the books I have says all I need is the
win32 sdk and I can compile apps. The closest thing I can find on msdn
is the microsoft platform sdk, or
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
[...]
Compiling under the SDK using MS tools gives us little value. We already
know that works. If you don't want to spend the cash on MSVC (and not make
MS any richer :)), and are willing to invest some time into it, I suggest
the following path:
On January 7, 2003 03:39 am, Francois Gouget wrote:
1. get the sources to a Linux machine
2. run winemaker on the sources to generate Makefiles
We should modify winemaker to use winegcc. There's now
a lot of (bad) duplication between winemaker, and winegcc,
like wrapper support, linking, etc.
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On January 7, 2003 03:39 am, Francois Gouget wrote:
1. get the sources to a Linux machine
2. run winemaker on the sources to generate Makefiles
We should modify winemaker to use winegcc. There's now
a lot of (bad) duplication between winemaker,
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On January 7, 2003 02:25 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
* winemaker
The assumption is that you have a Windows application (complete with
CR/LF), most likely based on Visual C++ and thus with no suitable
makefiles. So winemaker's goal is to
On January 8, 2003 01:18 am, David Fraser wrote:
Me! Do we have a task list for this?
Depends on what you want to work on :)
If you want to adapt winemaker to better integrate with winegcc,
I'm your man! g
--
Dimi.
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On January 7, 2003 02:25 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
* winemaker
The assumption is that you have a Windows application (complete with
CR/LF), most likely based on Visual C++ and thus with no suitable
makefiles. So
On 2001.12.09 17:15 Oliver Sampson wrote:
[SNIP]
ot
Why is the default behavior for the list to have replies go only to
the sender and not to the list?
/ot
Because that would be ridiculous. The only way to really accomplish that
is to add a Reply-To which means that it then becomes
On 2001.12.10 16:57 Oliver Sampson wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:30:04 -0500, David Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2001.12.09 17:15 Oliver Sampson wrote:
[SNIP]
ot
Why is the default behavior for the list to have replies go only to
the sender and not to the list?
/ot
So, it's solved. How did I solve it? Uh, I read the directions.
Rather than do a ./configuremake install as I listed below, I did
a ./tools/wineinstall.
Worked fine. WTF?
I guess I'll have a bit of a closer look at the wineinstall script,
and see what the difference was.
Anyhow, I'm
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:15:46PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
So, it's solved. How did I solve it? Uh, I read the directions.
Rather than do a ./configuremake install as I listed below, I did
a ./tools/wineinstall.
Worked fine. WTF?
I guess I'll have a bit of a closer look at
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 23:34:53 +0100, Andreas Mohr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what's the normal update process?
cvs update; make depend; make; make install?
Well, yeah.
But
cvs update
make depend all
is faster ;)
(provided you do have your wine setup prepared appropriately)
And do I dare
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:31:03 +0100, Andreas Mohr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
Howdy,
I'm trying to get started with Wine development, and I figured the
best way would be to CVS the code and install it.
I CVSed the code, configured,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:20:53PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:31:03 +0100, Andreas Mohr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
When I try to run wine, I get a message that libntdll.so wasn't found.
So I found it in
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 14:40:17 +0100, Andreas Mohr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:20:53PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:31:03 +0100, Andreas Mohr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
When I try to
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 04:33:53PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 14:40:17 +0100, Andreas Mohr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:20:53PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
I checked out my /etc/ld.so.conf and /usr/lib is listed in there.
libntdll.so is in my
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 16:33:53 +0100, you wrote:
I checked out my /etc/ld.so.conf and /usr/lib is listed in there.
libntdll.so is in my /usr/lib, but when ever I run wine from what I've
made, I get the message that libntdll.so can't be found:
wine: error while loading shared libraries:
Howdy,
I'm trying to get started with Wine development, and I figured the
best way would be to CVS the code and install it.
I CVSed the code, configured, did a 'make depend', 'make', and a 'make
install'.
When I try to run wine, I get a message that libntdll.so wasn't found.
So I found it in
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
Howdy,
I'm trying to get started with Wine development, and I figured the
best way would be to CVS the code and install it.
I CVSed the code, configured, did a 'make depend', 'make', and a 'make
install'.
When I try to run
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
[...]
Any ideas how to get this working from my cvs directory?
Simply *don't* do make install, but rather create symlinks in global dirs
or add to PATH.
Or add to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Many thanks for the ideas. I'll get right on them.
Oliver
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:50:16 -0800 (PST), Francois Gouget
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Oliver Sampson wrote:
[...]
Any ideas how to get this working from
26 matches
Mail list logo
