Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-31 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Eric Pouech wrote: my point is: - a company X has an audio player for Win32 - company X ports its app to Wine using the wine source, and it's mp3 player and makes a closed package of it - it'll have to pay for the license so I think this has to be documented somehow A+ Isn't it always the

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-30 Thread Eric Pouech
Uwe Bonnes a écrit : Marcus == Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marcus Hi, Apparently distributing even mp3 decoders is not royaltee Marcus free anymore, according to the slashdot thread and the Thomson Marcus MultiMedia pages.

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-30 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Eric Pouech [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: well, perhaps we should add a note in case someone makes a commercial package out of wine... LICENSE file should be the right place IMO. comments ? I don't think it belongs in LICENSE, but I do think the mp3 code should be disabled by default, with a

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-30 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
--- Eric Pouech [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Uwe Bonnes a écrit : no, there is misunderstanding. see http://newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/08/29/1633205tid=17 no fee is needed for the use of free players. only vendors needs to pay a fee. Marcus == Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-30 Thread Eric Pouech
Sylvain Petreolle a écrit : --- Eric Pouech [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Uwe Bonnes a écrit : no, there is misunderstanding. see http://newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/08/29/1633205tid=17 no fee is needed for the use of free players. only vendors needs to pay a fee. my point is: - a

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-30 Thread Eric Pouech
Alexandre Julliard a écrit : Eric Pouech [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: well, perhaps we should add a note in case someone makes a commercial package out of wine... LICENSE file should be the right place IMO. comments ? I don't think it belongs in LICENSE, but I do think the mp3 code

removing mp3 code

2002-08-29 Thread Marcus Meissner
Hi, Apparently distributing even mp3 decoders is not royaltee free anymore, according to the slashdot thread and the Thomson MultiMedia pages. So we probably should remove the msacm mp3 decoder we include. :( Ciao, Marcus

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-29 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Hello, On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: Apparently distributing even mp3 decoders is not royaltee free anymore, according to the slashdot thread and the Thomson MultiMedia pages. So we probably should remove the msacm mp3 decoder we include. :( I would wait

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-29 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:03:26AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: Hello, On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: Apparently distributing even mp3 decoders is not royaltee free anymore, according to the slashdot thread and the Thomson MultiMedia pages. So we

RE: removing mp3 code

2002-08-29 Thread Patrik Stridvall
Apparently distributing even mp3 decoders is not royaltee free anymore, according to the slashdot thread and the Thomson MultiMedia pages. So we probably should remove the msacm mp3 decoder we include. :( At the very least we should make it compile option that is by default disabled. I

Re: removing mp3 code

2002-08-29 Thread Uwe Bonnes
Marcus == Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marcus Hi, Apparently distributing even mp3 decoders is not royaltee Marcus free anymore, according to the slashdot thread and the Thomson Marcus MultiMedia pages. http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/vza-29.08.02-000/ (german)