x11drv WND separation

2002-11-05 Thread David Fraser
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On October 31, 2002 06:02 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is NOT in 0.8: -- stable server protocol: no binary compatibility -- DLL separation: ditto IMO the goals for 0.9 will be reached before the ones for

[Fwd: x11drv WND separation]

2002-11-05 Thread David Fraser
Hi Have had trouble getting through to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so reposting this to see... Funny, nothing's bounced... David Original Message Subject: x11drv WND separation Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 15:27:27 +0200 From: David Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL

Re: [Fwd: x11drv WND separation]

2002-11-05 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 5, 2002 08:59 am, David Fraser wrote: Does anyone have any info on what needs to be done to separate out the WND structure from USER? Is there any other stuff that should be separated out into x11drv? Presumably even if the separation isn't trivial some pointers could enable others

Re: [Fwd: x11drv WND separation]

2002-11-05 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, take what I said with a grain of salt. I looked a _bit_ around there, and it seems that is a big reason why it's going to be hard to separate the two. I just got the gut feeling that it will require some thought. I might be completely wrong,