RE: Thunking problem is partially solved

2000-08-29 Thread Patrik Stridvall
Browsing the disassembled (!) KERNEL32.ASM and PM65.ASM I noticed, that PM pushes some arguments on the stack before call to QT_Thunk and then doesn't pop them, i.e. PM assumes, that it is QT_Thunk's job. Only a little strange. Many functions are stdcall (callee pop arguments) However it

Generating patches from commit logs

2000-08-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Hi people, For the longest time I wanted to be able to look at some of the changes that make it into the repository. It is a great way to review code, follow the latest changes, and understand/learn new code areas. For the time being, one can (partially) do that by reading the diffs sent out by

Lost WM_LBUTTONUP messages....

2000-08-29 Thread Chris Morgan
I'm working on some changes to the treeview control and I'm having trouble with losing WM_LBUTTONUP messages. I have printf's in the handlers for lbuttondown/up messages and i'm seeing two WM_LBUTTONDOWN messages in a row, with a single LBUTTONUP message after these two. I get the same behavior

possibility for massive wineserver speedup

2000-08-29 Thread David Howells
Well, I've made a start on a kernel module implementing some wineserver-type functionality, and I think that I've reached a reasonable point to put it up for discussion. Note that you will need one of the later development Linux kernels to use it with (I use 2.4.0-test7) - I've attached the a