Re: spelling/typo fixes ect. -- lostwages

2003-07-04 Thread Andreas Mohr
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:47:21AM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote: Hi, Happy 4th :) Changelog 1) spelling/typo fixes 2) missilanious fixes If you decide to do 1), then it might be useful to also do that for 2) at the same time... Or should

Re: spelling/typo fixes ect. -- lostwages

2003-07-04 Thread Tom
Andreas Mohr wrote: On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:47:21AM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote: Hi, Happy 4th :) Changelog 1) spelling/typo fixes 2) missilanious fixes If you decide to do 1), then it might be useful to also do that for 2) at the same time

Re: Typo fixes

2003-06-10 Thread Jeremy Newman
FAILED at 400. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file wwn/wn20030523_171.xml.rej On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 16:28, Francois Gouget wrote: Apparently some typo fixes were not applied the first time around. So here's the second round. It can be applied by doing: cd lostwages patch -p0

Re: Typo fixes

2003-06-10 Thread Francois Gouget
On 10 Jun 2003, Jeremy Newman wrote: Francois, h, I don't know why, but this patch did not go. This is what I got. [EMAIL PROTECTED] lostwages]$ patch -p0 typos.diff patching file wwn/wn19990718_4.xml Hunk #1 FAILED at 977. Hunk #2 FAILED at 996. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving

Re: Typo fixes

2003-06-09 Thread Duane Clark
Francois Gouget wrote: -As to the implict existance question: I'm not sure. +As to the implict existence question: I'm not sure. +As to the implicit existence question: I'm not sure. ^

Re: Typo fixes

2003-06-09 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Duane Clark wrote: Francois Gouget wrote: -As to the implict existance question: I'm not sure. +As to the implict existence question: I'm not sure. +As to the implicit existence question: I'm not sure. Ah, I wasn't looking for that one. I'll send a patch to fix it with

minor typo in winemaker

2002-09-27 Thread Bill Medland
diff102.diff Description: Binary data

Re: Patch - Fix typo

2002-09-12 Thread Andreas Mohr
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:27:50PM +0200, Patrik Stridvall wrote: I noticed this when adapting WINE code for ReactOS [...] - * DialogBoxIndirectParam (USER.240) - * DialogBoxIndirectParam16 (USER32.) + * DialogBoxIndirectParam16 (USER.240) + *

RE: Patch - Fix typo

2002-09-12 Thread Patrik Stridvall
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:27:50PM +0200, Patrik Stridvall wrote: I noticed this when adapting WINE code for ReactOS [...] - * DialogBoxIndirectParam (USER.240) - * DialogBoxIndirectParam16 (USER32.) + * DialogBoxIndirectParam16 (USER.240)

typo?

2000-11-13 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Log message: Export the CallFrom16xxx functions from kernel32. Renamed them __wine_call_from_16 to follow the naming convention. ... +@ varargs __wine_call_from_16_word() __wine_call_from_16_word +@ varargs __wine_call_from_16_long() __wine_call_from_16_word +@ varargs