On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 19:06 +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
On Friday 24 November 2006 13:33, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
after my last patch to yet 'remove' another test I had another look at
tests.winehq.org. With the arrival of IE7 and of course a lot of changes
to dll's (not even mentioning
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 12:41 +, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Changelog:
winex11.drv: Cast-qual warning fix + remove superfluous HeapFree().
diff -urN a/dlls/winex11.drv/clipboard.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/clipboard.c
--- a/dlls/winex11.drv/clipboard.c2006-10-09 20:06:04.0 +0100
+++
Paul Vriens wrote:
Just out of curiosity. Why is the HeapFree superfluous? It is allocated
a few lines above and not free-ed in this fail condition.
Cheers,
Paul.
Hi Paul,
The fail condition is that no memory was available, therefore, what is there
to free?
-- Andy.
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 14:01 +, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Just out of curiosity. Why is the HeapFree superfluous? It is allocated
a few lines above and not free-ed in this fail condition.
Cheers,
Paul.
Hi Paul,
The fail condition is that no memory was
Hi Andy,
the failing allocation was for lpNewFormat-Name. The freeing was for
lpNewFormat on line 516 (original).
Cheers,
Paul.
Whoops! You're right. Thank you for pointing it out; I shall post a please
ignore to wine-patches.
-- Andy.
On 11/25/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 19:06 +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
On Friday 24 November 2006 13:33, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
after my last patch to yet 'remove' another test I had another look at
tests.winehq.org. With the arrival of IE7 and of course a
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 07:33 -0800, James Hawkins wrote:
The if 0 exclusion is enough because it shows that at one point
advpack checked for the null parameter, but now it doesn't on some
versions. We check for the null param, so we're on the safe side of
the fence. Not many apps/installers
Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The one mentioned is maybe the wrong example as it's quite clear. The
point however is that this test will never be run anymore as long as
nobody cares.
That's how it should be. If the behavior across Windows versions is
inconsistent, it means that no app
Vitaly wrote:
[xdg-utils] can not handle files with spaces in them.
If that's true, it's a bug, and should be fixed.
Also they don't allow installing icons without specifying size.
? http://portland.freedesktop.org/xdg-utils-1.0/xdg-desktop-icon.html
doesn't seem to talk about sizes at
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 07:55:38AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
[We can't just check the scripts into the wine source tree
and require their installation.]
Why not? If they save effort and work well, let's do it.
Yes please. If they save tons of efforts via the Oh So Ugly
mechanism of
Dan Kegel wrote:
Vitaly wrote:
[xdg-utils] can not handle files with spaces in them.
If that's true, it's a bug, and should be fixed.
Yes it have to be fixed.
Also they don't allow installing icons without specifying size.
?
On Saturday 25 November 2006 17:50, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
Vitaly wrote:
[xdg-utils] can not handle files with spaces in them.
If that's true, it's a bug, and should be fixed.
Yes it have to be fixed.
It's sad though, that even developers of free software projects
Hi,
From the buglist I gather that the fontforge dependency is still an issue.
I've taken a look at the sources and I think a can strip it down to
about 5 to 10 pages of code without a major rewrite.
If this is acceptable, I'd be happy to spend my time.
Theun van der Veen
On Saturday 25 November 2006 18:34, Kevin Krammer wrote:
It's sad though, that even developers of free software projects seem to
think that unreported bugs magically fix themselves.
They don't? Damn. Next someone will say that Santa isn't real.
Kai
--
Kai Blin, kai Dot blin At gmail Dot
On 11/24/06, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[xdg-utils] can not handle files with spaces in them.
Probably because GNOME cannot handle files with spaces in them for the menus.
--
Travis Watkins
http://www.realistanew.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From the buglist I gather that the fontforge dependency is still an issue.
I've taken a look at the sources and I think a can strip it down to
about 5 to 10 pages of code without a major rewrite.
If this is acceptable, I'd be happy to spend my time.
Are you
It seems there is no end to how far will packagers go to brake Wine by
trying to make it better
I thought it's been fixed a long time ago, but it seems not. Wine
packages for Debian split important Wine parts into separate packages:
- wine - fonts, few not essential programs, symlinks and
17 matches
Mail list logo
